PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a patient-specific cutting guide on both coronal and sagittal alignment compared to the pre-operative planning in OWHTO.MethodsTwelve OWHTO on 6 cadaveric specimens were performed by 3 experienced knee surgeons using patient-specific cutting guides based on 3D pre-operative planning. Since the specimens had no major deformities, a fixed correction of 6 & DEG; on the left and 10 & DEG; on the right legs were carried out to simulate different scenarios. A pre-operative and post-OWHTO 3D CT scans were performed, and images were superimposed using the dedicated 3D planning software to align their reference axes. A pre-operative planning was performed considering both Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) and Posterior Tibial Slope (PTS), and a patient-specific cutting guide was produced. Planned and post-OWHTO MPTA and PTS were evaluated (mean and standard deviation), and Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess precision and accuracy of the whole treatment.ResultsA mean correction of 6,1 & DEG; (SD 1,9 & DEG;) and 1,2 & DEG; (SD 1 & DEG;) was obtained respectively in the coronal plane (MPTA) and in the sagittal plane (PTS). The average difference between planned and post-OWHTO MPTA and PTS was respectively 1,2 & DEG; (SD 0,6 & DEG;) and 1,2 & DEG; (SD 1 & DEG;) in the sagittal plane (PTS). Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a good accuracy of the treatment in both coronal and sagittal plane (respectively r=0,95 and r=0,86). No lateral hinge fractures were detected at the post-operative CT scan.ConclusionOWTHO performed with the help of 3D patient specific cutting guide on cadaveric specimens demonstrated good accuracy and reliability in obtaining the planned correction. In vivo studies are necessary to confirm these results and evaluate cost-effectiveness of this system.
A new three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guide for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy based on ct scan: preliminary in vitro results
Rossi, Roberto;Bonasia, Davide Edoardo;
2023-01-01
Abstract
PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a patient-specific cutting guide on both coronal and sagittal alignment compared to the pre-operative planning in OWHTO.MethodsTwelve OWHTO on 6 cadaveric specimens were performed by 3 experienced knee surgeons using patient-specific cutting guides based on 3D pre-operative planning. Since the specimens had no major deformities, a fixed correction of 6 & DEG; on the left and 10 & DEG; on the right legs were carried out to simulate different scenarios. A pre-operative and post-OWHTO 3D CT scans were performed, and images were superimposed using the dedicated 3D planning software to align their reference axes. A pre-operative planning was performed considering both Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) and Posterior Tibial Slope (PTS), and a patient-specific cutting guide was produced. Planned and post-OWHTO MPTA and PTS were evaluated (mean and standard deviation), and Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated to assess precision and accuracy of the whole treatment.ResultsA mean correction of 6,1 & DEG; (SD 1,9 & DEG;) and 1,2 & DEG; (SD 1 & DEG;) was obtained respectively in the coronal plane (MPTA) and in the sagittal plane (PTS). The average difference between planned and post-OWHTO MPTA and PTS was respectively 1,2 & DEG; (SD 0,6 & DEG;) and 1,2 & DEG; (SD 1 & DEG;) in the sagittal plane (PTS). Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a good accuracy of the treatment in both coronal and sagittal plane (respectively r=0,95 and r=0,86). No lateral hinge fractures were detected at the post-operative CT scan.ConclusionOWTHO performed with the help of 3D patient specific cutting guide on cadaveric specimens demonstrated good accuracy and reliability in obtaining the planned correction. In vivo studies are necessary to confirm these results and evaluate cost-effectiveness of this system.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
125 exp orthop.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
1.56 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.56 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.