The case annotation analyses the Inter Consulting case, where the CJEU consistently held that the evaluation of the identity of facts must be made according to the facts as they are described in any relevant procedural act, including the grounds of a decision. Any limitation to the facts as they are described in the formal indictment or in the operative part of a final decision unduly restrict the scope of application of Arts 50 Charter and 54 CISA.

Analysis: Avoiding formalistic limitations to the scope of the European ne bis in idem: The Court of Justice on the assessment of the idem factum criterion (C 726/21, Inter Consulting).

Stefano Montaldo
2023-01-01

Abstract

The case annotation analyses the Inter Consulting case, where the CJEU consistently held that the evaluation of the identity of facts must be made according to the facts as they are described in any relevant procedural act, including the grounds of a decision. Any limitation to the facts as they are described in the formal indictment or in the operative part of a final decision unduly restrict the scope of application of Arts 50 Charter and 54 CISA.
2023
1
3
https://eulawlive.com/analysis-avoiding-formalistic-limitations-to-the-scope-of-the-european-ne-bis-in-idem-the-court-of-justice-on-the-assessment-of-the-idem-factum-criterion-c-726-21-inter-consulting/
ne bis in idem, idem factum, procedural acts, description of facts
Stefano Montaldo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023 - EU Law Live - Analysis - Inter Consulting - SM.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 174.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
174.74 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1946110
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact