The present chapter first sets the ground of the investigation by shortly describing how the Habitats (HD) and Birds Directives (WBD) were implemented in Italy . The illustration of both the doctrines of judicial restraint and of the limited tools administrative courts have to access the facts of the case will then follow. A number of cases will be analysed. However, the sharp dichotomy between facts and law is a poor guide to understanding judicial review in Italy.

Of Ostensible Self-Restraint, Explicit Environmental Protection, and a Missing Link: The Appropriate Assessment in Italy

Roberto Caranta
2023-01-01

Abstract

The present chapter first sets the ground of the investigation by shortly describing how the Habitats (HD) and Birds Directives (WBD) were implemented in Italy . The illustration of both the doctrines of judicial restraint and of the limited tools administrative courts have to access the facts of the case will then follow. A number of cases will be analysed. However, the sharp dichotomy between facts and law is a poor guide to understanding judicial review in Italy.
2023
EU Environmental principles and scientific uncertainty before national courts. The Case of the Habitats Directive
Hart Publishing
141
161
9781509948222
Environmental Law, Judicial review
Roberto Caranta
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Ch 7 Italy.docx

Accesso aperto con embargo fino al 31/01/2025

Dimensione 78.62 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
78.62 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1947335
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact