The present chapter first sets the ground of the investigation by shortly describing how the Habitats (HD) and Birds Directives (WBD) were implemented in Italy . The illustration of both the doctrines of judicial restraint and of the limited tools administrative courts have to access the facts of the case will then follow. A number of cases will be analysed. However, the sharp dichotomy between facts and law is a poor guide to understanding judicial review in Italy.
Of Ostensible Self-Restraint, Explicit Environmental Protection, and a Missing Link: The Appropriate Assessment in Italy
Roberto Caranta
2023-01-01
Abstract
The present chapter first sets the ground of the investigation by shortly describing how the Habitats (HD) and Birds Directives (WBD) were implemented in Italy . The illustration of both the doctrines of judicial restraint and of the limited tools administrative courts have to access the facts of the case will then follow. A number of cases will be analysed. However, the sharp dichotomy between facts and law is a poor guide to understanding judicial review in Italy.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ch 7 Italy.docx
Accesso aperto con embargo fino al 31/01/2025
Dimensione
78.62 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
78.62 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.