Among the several Herculanean testimonia to Parmenides, fr. 13 of PHerc. 1428 no doubt represents the most important piece of evidence. A new autopsy of the papyrus made a reconstruction of the name ‘Eros’ at line 12 possible. Within the Doxa section of Parmenides’ poem, Eros is notoriously described as the first of the gods to be created by Aphrodite (DK 28 B 13). In fr. 12 DK, Aphrodite is defined in turn as the goddess governing the universe, who represents the balancing point of the astronomical theory of celestial spheres. In the second part of the Herculanean fragment, Philodemus says that, according to Parmenides, the «first god» would be inanimate and that gods who were generated by him would have, in the view of mortal people, the same passions of human beings. The paper argues that Philodemus could have a) either intentionally mixed his sources in order to create a pendant between PHerc. 1428’s frs. 12 (on Xenophanes) and 13 (on Parmenides); b) gone back to an older tradition, later developed by early Stoicism, which exactly describes the «first god» as the ruler of the universe and absolutely devoid of human passions; c) or mixed some attributes of Parmenides’ god with those ascribed to One by his follower Melissus.

Parmenides and the «First God»: Doxographical Strategies in Philodemus’ On Piety. Praesocratica Herculanensia VII

Christian Vassallo
2016-01-01

Abstract

Among the several Herculanean testimonia to Parmenides, fr. 13 of PHerc. 1428 no doubt represents the most important piece of evidence. A new autopsy of the papyrus made a reconstruction of the name ‘Eros’ at line 12 possible. Within the Doxa section of Parmenides’ poem, Eros is notoriously described as the first of the gods to be created by Aphrodite (DK 28 B 13). In fr. 12 DK, Aphrodite is defined in turn as the goddess governing the universe, who represents the balancing point of the astronomical theory of celestial spheres. In the second part of the Herculanean fragment, Philodemus says that, according to Parmenides, the «first god» would be inanimate and that gods who were generated by him would have, in the view of mortal people, the same passions of human beings. The paper argues that Philodemus could have a) either intentionally mixed his sources in order to create a pendant between PHerc. 1428’s frs. 12 (on Xenophanes) and 13 (on Parmenides); b) gone back to an older tradition, later developed by early Stoicism, which exactly describes the «first god» as the ruler of the universe and absolutely devoid of human passions; c) or mixed some attributes of Parmenides’ god with those ascribed to One by his follower Melissus.
2016
22
29
57
Ancient doxography; Cosmology; Eros; Herculaneum Papyri; Parmenides; Philodemus; Theology
Christian Vassallo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Hyperboreus, 22 (2016) 29-57.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 637.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
637.39 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1950133
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact