In 2005, Evo Morales won a historic election, leading a political movement which merged indigenous activism with opposition to neoliberal reforms. While the approval of a new constitution and a second landslide victory for Morales in 2010 seemed to set the basis for a revitalized phase of his political project, new tensions emerged within the coalition of popular forces that supported it. The tipping point in the relationship between the government and indigenous groups was marked by an internationally famous dispute around the construction of a road cutting across the Isoboro Sécure National Park and Indigenous Territory (TIPNIS). The plan was supported by campesino migrants of Aymara and Quechua origins but strongly opposed by some lowland indigenous groups based on environmental concerns and the lack of prior consultation, as mandated by Bolivian and international law. This conflict not only marked a turning point in the political alliance between the Morales government and large sectors of the Bolivian indigenous movement, but it also revealed a nuanced picture of pan‐rural relationships and the challenges of conciliating urgent and conflicting demands: identity revitalization, environmental protection, economic development, and political participation.
Indigenous Protest in Bolivia Against Evo Morales
Lorenza B. Fontana
2023-01-01
Abstract
In 2005, Evo Morales won a historic election, leading a political movement which merged indigenous activism with opposition to neoliberal reforms. While the approval of a new constitution and a second landslide victory for Morales in 2010 seemed to set the basis for a revitalized phase of his political project, new tensions emerged within the coalition of popular forces that supported it. The tipping point in the relationship between the government and indigenous groups was marked by an internationally famous dispute around the construction of a road cutting across the Isoboro Sécure National Park and Indigenous Territory (TIPNIS). The plan was supported by campesino migrants of Aymara and Quechua origins but strongly opposed by some lowland indigenous groups based on environmental concerns and the lack of prior consultation, as mandated by Bolivian and international law. This conflict not only marked a turning point in the political alliance between the Morales government and large sectors of the Bolivian indigenous movement, but it also revealed a nuanced picture of pan‐rural relationships and the challenges of conciliating urgent and conflicting demands: identity revitalization, environmental protection, economic development, and political participation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
wbespm574-1.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
820.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
820.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements - 2022 - Fontana - Indigenous Protest in Bolivia Against.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
48.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
48.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.