In 2005, Evo Morales won a historic election, leading a political movement which merged indigenous activism with opposition to neoliberal reforms. While the approval of a new constitution and a second landslide victory for Morales in 2010 seemed to set the basis for a revitalized phase of his political project, new tensions emerged within the coalition of popular forces that supported it. The tipping point in the relationship between the government and indigenous groups was marked by an internationally famous dispute around the construction of a road cutting across the Isoboro Sécure National Park and Indigenous Territory (TIPNIS). The plan was supported by campesino migrants of Aymara and Quechua origins but strongly opposed by some lowland indigenous groups based on environmental concerns and the lack of prior consultation, as mandated by Bolivian and international law. This conflict not only marked a turning point in the political alliance between the Morales government and large sectors of the Bolivian indigenous movement, but it also revealed a nuanced picture of pan‐rural relationships and the challenges of conciliating urgent and conflicting demands: identity revitalization, environmental protection, economic development, and political participation.

Indigenous Protest in Bolivia Against Evo Morales

Lorenza B. Fontana
2023-01-01

Abstract

In 2005, Evo Morales won a historic election, leading a political movement which merged indigenous activism with opposition to neoliberal reforms. While the approval of a new constitution and a second landslide victory for Morales in 2010 seemed to set the basis for a revitalized phase of his political project, new tensions emerged within the coalition of popular forces that supported it. The tipping point in the relationship between the government and indigenous groups was marked by an internationally famous dispute around the construction of a road cutting across the Isoboro Sécure National Park and Indigenous Territory (TIPNIS). The plan was supported by campesino migrants of Aymara and Quechua origins but strongly opposed by some lowland indigenous groups based on environmental concerns and the lack of prior consultation, as mandated by Bolivian and international law. This conflict not only marked a turning point in the political alliance between the Morales government and large sectors of the Bolivian indigenous movement, but it also revealed a nuanced picture of pan‐rural relationships and the challenges of conciliating urgent and conflicting demands: identity revitalization, environmental protection, economic development, and political participation.
2023
The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements
Wiley-Blackwell
1
4
9781405197731
9780470674871
Lorenza B. Fontana
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
wbespm574-1.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 820.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
820.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1952060
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact