Public procurement has been regulated by (then) European Economic Community (EEC) second-ary law since 1971. Substantive EU rules aim at enforcing non-discrimination in the internal market.To this end, they prescribe competitive and transparent award procedures contracting authorities orentities must follow to choose their partner. Remedies for breaches of substantive procurement ruleshave been the object of an early codification in (then) EEC law. The recitals in Directive 89/665/EECclearly state the issue the directive itself is expected to address: existing arrangements at both nationaland Community levels for ensuring their application are not always adequate to ensure compliancewith the relevant Community provisions particularly at a stage when infringements can be corrected.Many remedies, however, are only named without much details being provided on what is requiredat national level. Moreover, in the past few years, the Court of Justice seems to have become morerestrained in adding details to the Remedies Directives, having instead more and more often recourseto the principle of procedural autonomy. This leaves much uncertainty on the standard of reviewrequired or appropriate under the Remedies Directives

Key Issues for Effective Procurement Remedies

Roberto Caranta
2022-01-01

Abstract

Public procurement has been regulated by (then) European Economic Community (EEC) second-ary law since 1971. Substantive EU rules aim at enforcing non-discrimination in the internal market.To this end, they prescribe competitive and transparent award procedures contracting authorities orentities must follow to choose their partner. Remedies for breaches of substantive procurement ruleshave been the object of an early codification in (then) EEC law. The recitals in Directive 89/665/EECclearly state the issue the directive itself is expected to address: existing arrangements at both nationaland Community levels for ensuring their application are not always adequate to ensure compliancewith the relevant Community provisions particularly at a stage when infringements can be corrected.Many remedies, however, are only named without much details being provided on what is requiredat national level. Moreover, in the past few years, the Court of Justice seems to have become morerestrained in adding details to the Remedies Directives, having instead more and more often recourseto the principle of procedural autonomy. This leaves much uncertainty on the standard of reviewrequired or appropriate under the Remedies Directives
2022
101
125
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366873448_Key_Issues_for_Effective_Procurement_Remedies#fullTextFileContent
public procurement; remedies; non-discrimination; internal market; standard of review
Roberto Caranta
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Key_Issues_for_Effective_Procurement_Remedies.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 386.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
386.56 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1952210
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact