Aims: Colorectal adenomatous polyposis entailing cancer predisposition is caused by constitutional mutations in different genes. APC is associated with the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP/AFAP) and MUTYH with the MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), while POLE and POLD1 mutations cause the polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP). Methods: We screened for mutations in patients with multiple adenomas/FAP: 121 patients were analyzed for APC and MUTYH mutations, and 36 patients were also evaluated for POLE and POLD1 gene mutations. Results: We found 20 FAP/AFAP, 15MAP, and no PPAP subjects: pathogenic mutations proved to be heterogeneous, and included 5 APC and 1 MUTYH novel mutations. The mutation detection rate was significantly different between patients with 5-100 polyps and those with >100 polyps (p = 8.154 x 10(-7)), with APC mutations being associated with an aggressive phenotype (p = 1.279 x 10(-9)). Mean age at diagnosis was lower in FAP/AFAP compared to MAP (p = 3.055 x 10(-4)). Mutation-negative probands showed a mean age at diagnosis that was significantly higher than FAP/AFAP (p = 3.46986 x 10(-7)) and included 45.3% of patientswith <30 polyps and 70.9% of patients with no family history. Conclusions: This study enlarges the APC and MUTYH mutational spectra, and also evaluated variants of uncertain significance, including the MUTYH p.Gln338His mutation. Moreover this study underscores the phenotypic heterogeneity and genotype-phenotype correlations in a cohort of Italian patients.

Colorectal Adenomatous Polyposis: Heterogeneity of Susceptibility Gene Mutations and Phenotypes in a Cohort of Italian Patients

Berrino, Enrico;Venesio, Tiziana;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Aims: Colorectal adenomatous polyposis entailing cancer predisposition is caused by constitutional mutations in different genes. APC is associated with the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP/AFAP) and MUTYH with the MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP), while POLE and POLD1 mutations cause the polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PPAP). Methods: We screened for mutations in patients with multiple adenomas/FAP: 121 patients were analyzed for APC and MUTYH mutations, and 36 patients were also evaluated for POLE and POLD1 gene mutations. Results: We found 20 FAP/AFAP, 15MAP, and no PPAP subjects: pathogenic mutations proved to be heterogeneous, and included 5 APC and 1 MUTYH novel mutations. The mutation detection rate was significantly different between patients with 5-100 polyps and those with >100 polyps (p = 8.154 x 10(-7)), with APC mutations being associated with an aggressive phenotype (p = 1.279 x 10(-9)). Mean age at diagnosis was lower in FAP/AFAP compared to MAP (p = 3.055 x 10(-4)). Mutation-negative probands showed a mean age at diagnosis that was significantly higher than FAP/AFAP (p = 3.46986 x 10(-7)) and included 45.3% of patientswith <30 polyps and 70.9% of patients with no family history. Conclusions: This study enlarges the APC and MUTYH mutational spectra, and also evaluated variants of uncertain significance, including the MUTYH p.Gln338His mutation. Moreover this study underscores the phenotypic heterogeneity and genotype-phenotype correlations in a cohort of Italian patients.
2016
20
12
777
785
FAP-MAP; genetic predisposition to colorectal polyposis; genotype-phenotype in colorectal polyposis
Marabelli, Monica; Molinaro, Valeria; Khouzam, Raefa Abou; Berrino, Enrico; Panero, Mara; Balsamo, Antonella; Venesio, Tiziana; Ranzani, Guglielmina Nadia
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
marabelli-et-al-2016-colorectal-adenomatous-polyposis-heterogeneity-of-susceptibility-gene-mutations-and-phenotypes-in (1).pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 297.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.22 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1954911
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact