The paper critically examines sentence no. 126 of 2023, with which the Constitutional Court accepted an appeal for a peculiar conflict of powers, characterized by the challenge by the Chamber of Deputies against the Court of Lecce of having «ignored», or knowingly «not applied», the rule of the «minor» regulation of the Chamber which subjects the annuities of former deputies to the same seizure limit as common social security credits.

Natura previdenziale dei vitalizi parlamentari ed autonomia regolamentare delle Camere: la Corte decide un conflitto peculiare

G. SOBRINO
2023-01-01

Abstract

The paper critically examines sentence no. 126 of 2023, with which the Constitutional Court accepted an appeal for a peculiar conflict of powers, characterized by the challenge by the Chamber of Deputies against the Court of Lecce of having «ignored», or knowingly «not applied», the rule of the «minor» regulation of the Chamber which subjects the annuities of former deputies to the same seizure limit as common social security credits.
2023
4/2023
1816
1826
G. SOBRINO
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
G. Sobrino - Natura previdenziale dei vitalizi parlamentari e autonomia regolamentare delle Camere (2023).pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Nota pubblicata sulla Rivista
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 276.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
276.12 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1962853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact