We assess the predictive power of a model of other-regarding preferences inequality aversion using a within-subject design. We run four different experiments (ultimatum game, dictator game, sequential-move prisoners' dilemma and public-good game) with the same sample of subjects. We elicit two parameters of inequality aversion to test several hypotheses across games. We find that within-subject tests can differ markedly from aggregate-level analyses. Inequality-aversion has predictive power at the aggregate level but performs less well at the individual level. The model seems to capture various behavioral motives in different games but the correlation of these motives is low within subjects. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences

Blanco, Mariana;
2011-01-01

Abstract

We assess the predictive power of a model of other-regarding preferences inequality aversion using a within-subject design. We run four different experiments (ultimatum game, dictator game, sequential-move prisoners' dilemma and public-good game) with the same sample of subjects. We elicit two parameters of inequality aversion to test several hypotheses across games. We find that within-subject tests can differ markedly from aggregate-level analyses. Inequality-aversion has predictive power at the aggregate level but performs less well at the individual level. The model seems to capture various behavioral motives in different games but the correlation of these motives is low within subjects. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
2011
72
2
321
338
Behavioral economics; Experimental economics; Inequality aversion; Other-regarding preferences
Blanco, Mariana; Engelmann, Dirk; Normann, Hans Theo
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1968850
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 269
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 257
social impact