Intended beneficiaries have an undeniable relevance to regulation. However, current research has focused mainly on the two-party relationship between rulemaking and rule-taking. We attempt to fill this gap by exploring the formal and informal roles that beneficiaries’ intermediaries played in co-creating European Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) rules and associated practices between 2000 and 2017. By linking recent conceptualizations of regulatory intermediaries with the literature on critical political CSR, we offer a more dynamic and contextualized understanding of the roles of beneficiaries’ intermediaries. Specifically, we identify six micro-dynamics through which they influenced the regulatory process. Notably, our findings highlight how the convergence of interests between three groups of beneficiaries’ intermediaries – the Non-governmental organization–Investor–Union nexus – had a key role in reshaping CSR rules. We conclude that, in the European context, stronger and better-coordinated beneficiaries’ intermediaries are crucial in order to achieve more effective corporate conduct regulation.

The European regulation of corporate social responsibility: The role of beneficiaries' intermediaries

Monciardini D.
;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Intended beneficiaries have an undeniable relevance to regulation. However, current research has focused mainly on the two-party relationship between rulemaking and rule-taking. We attempt to fill this gap by exploring the formal and informal roles that beneficiaries’ intermediaries played in co-creating European Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) rules and associated practices between 2000 and 2017. By linking recent conceptualizations of regulatory intermediaries with the literature on critical political CSR, we offer a more dynamic and contextualized understanding of the roles of beneficiaries’ intermediaries. Specifically, we identify six micro-dynamics through which they influenced the regulatory process. Notably, our findings highlight how the convergence of interests between three groups of beneficiaries’ intermediaries – the Non-governmental organization–Investor–Union nexus – had a key role in reshaping CSR rules. We conclude that, in the European context, stronger and better-coordinated beneficiaries’ intermediaries are crucial in order to achieve more effective corporate conduct regulation.
2019
13
2
240
259
corporate reporting; corporate social responsibility; EU regulation; regulatory intermediary; responsible investment
Monciardini D.; Conaldi G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Monciardini & Conaldi 2019.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Intended beneficiaries have an undeniable relevance to regulation. However, current research has focused mainly on the two-party relationship between rulemaking and rule-taking. We attempt to fill this gap by exploring the formal and informal roles that beneficiaries’ intermediaries played in co-creating European Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) rules and associated practices between 2000 and 2017. By linking recent conceptualizations of regulatory intermediaries with the literature on critical political CSR, we offer a more dynamic and contextualized understanding of the roles of beneficiaries’ intermediaries. Specifically, we identify six micro-dynamics through which they influenced the regulatory process. Notably, our findings highlight how the convergence of interests between three groups of beneficiaries’ intermediaries – the Nongovernmental organization–Investor–Union nexus – had a key role in reshaping CSR rules. We conclude that, in the European context, stronger and better-coordinated beneficiaries’ intermediaries are crucial in order to achieve more effective corporate conduct regulation.
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 310.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
310.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1971390
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact