Thanks to Gaia DR2, we proved for the first time that a general relativistic Milky Way rotation curve is statistically indistinguishable from its state-of-the-art dark matter analogue. Those results supported the ansatz that gravitational dragging can explain the observed flatness of the Milky Way rotation curve with a consistent radial matter density profile. To challenge again such a scenario, we select 719 143 young disc stars within |z| < 1 kpc and up to R ≃ 19 kpc from Gaia DR3 providing a much larger sample of high-quality astrometric and spectrophotometric data of unprecedented homogeneity. This sample comprises 241 918 OBA stars, 475 520 RGB giants, and 1705 Cepheides that we use to fit, as with DR2, both a classical velocity profile model, i.e. with a dark matter halo, and a general relativistic analogue derived from a dust disc-scale metric. Once more, further corroborating our earlier findings, both models are found to explain, with similar statistical quality, the new observed rotational velocities derived from different combinations of the selected sets of stars belonging to the disc of our Galaxy. The geometrical effect is found to drive the velocity profile from 10 kpc outwards, while being responsible for ∼30-37 per cent of this profile already at the Sun distance, similarly to the halo contribution in the classical model. This confirms our previous results on the contribution of Einstein's geometry and pushes to further investigate the role of General Relativity in tracing the Milky Way rotation curve; notably, the origin of this gravitational dragging remains undetermined, necessitating a dedicated in-depth exploration.

Geometry-driven and dark-matter-sustained Milky Way rotation curves with Gaia DR3

Beordo W.;Crosta M.;Lattanzi M. G.;Re Fiorentin P.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Thanks to Gaia DR2, we proved for the first time that a general relativistic Milky Way rotation curve is statistically indistinguishable from its state-of-the-art dark matter analogue. Those results supported the ansatz that gravitational dragging can explain the observed flatness of the Milky Way rotation curve with a consistent radial matter density profile. To challenge again such a scenario, we select 719 143 young disc stars within |z| < 1 kpc and up to R ≃ 19 kpc from Gaia DR3 providing a much larger sample of high-quality astrometric and spectrophotometric data of unprecedented homogeneity. This sample comprises 241 918 OBA stars, 475 520 RGB giants, and 1705 Cepheides that we use to fit, as with DR2, both a classical velocity profile model, i.e. with a dark matter halo, and a general relativistic analogue derived from a dust disc-scale metric. Once more, further corroborating our earlier findings, both models are found to explain, with similar statistical quality, the new observed rotational velocities derived from different combinations of the selected sets of stars belonging to the disc of our Galaxy. The geometrical effect is found to drive the velocity profile from 10 kpc outwards, while being responsible for ∼30-37 per cent of this profile already at the Sun distance, similarly to the halo contribution in the classical model. This confirms our previous results on the contribution of Einstein's geometry and pushes to further investigate the role of General Relativity in tracing the Milky Way rotation curve; notably, the origin of this gravitational dragging remains undetermined, necessitating a dedicated in-depth exploration.
2024
529
4
4681
4698
astrometry; catalogues; dark matter; Galaxy: disc; Galaxy: kinematics and dynamics; gravitation
Beordo W.; Crosta M.; Lattanzi M.G.; Re Fiorentin P.; Spagna A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
stae855.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 15.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
15.89 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1990394
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact