The paper examines the European Court of Human Rights’ approach to the problem of establishing the sincerity of religiously motivated claims of privileged treatment, focussing upon the different types of litigation that call for this kind of evidence, as well as the Court’s criteria for allocating the burden of proof and assessing individual conduct from the standpoint of consistency.

The proof of religious convictions in the caselaw of the European Court of Human Rights

Maria Chiara Ruscazio
2024-01-01

Abstract

The paper examines the European Court of Human Rights’ approach to the problem of establishing the sincerity of religiously motivated claims of privileged treatment, focussing upon the different types of litigation that call for this kind of evidence, as well as the Court’s criteria for allocating the burden of proof and assessing individual conduct from the standpoint of consistency.
2024
553
566
Proof, sincerity, coherence
Maria Chiara Ruscazio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RUSCAZIO M.C., The proof.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 781.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
781.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1994230
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact