Solid set canopy delivery system (SSCDS), a fixed spray system variant, has the potential to realize automated and timely spray applications in modern grapevine production systems typical of Washington State in the United States. Optimized SSCDS configurations could be a viable replacement for conventional pesticide application equipment (PAE) and can also help with abiotic stress management. However, SSCDS, as a PAE, should effectively mitigate the risks and environmental impacts associated with pesticide use. This study was thus aimed at evaluating a pneumatic spray delivery (PSD)-SSCDS, first in the laboratory and then under field conditions, to understand system cleaning performance according to a methodology based on the ISO22368-1 (2004) standard for such fixed and semi-mobile sprayers. The cleaning performance was quantified as the percent amount of residue in the SSCDS components after the spray application. A pilot laboratory setup was used to evaluate the PSD-SSCDS component cleaning performance. The system was cleaned using five viable cleaning techniques: air injection for 30 (conventional cleaning technique), 60, 90, and 300 s, and one water rinse after 30 s air injection. The technique that performed best was field evaluated in a large-scale modern grapevine layout. Overall, the use of water to rinse the system component achieved cleaning performance >99.67%. Field trials also demonstrated that the PSD-SSCDS layout was easy to clean through a triple water rinse and capable of meeting the ISO16119-4 (2014) set threshold.

Cleaning Performance Evaluation of Pneumatic Spray Delivery Based Solid Set Canopy Delivery System

Mozzanini, Eric
First
;
Grella, Marco
;
Balsari, Paolo;Gioelli, Fabrizio;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Solid set canopy delivery system (SSCDS), a fixed spray system variant, has the potential to realize automated and timely spray applications in modern grapevine production systems typical of Washington State in the United States. Optimized SSCDS configurations could be a viable replacement for conventional pesticide application equipment (PAE) and can also help with abiotic stress management. However, SSCDS, as a PAE, should effectively mitigate the risks and environmental impacts associated with pesticide use. This study was thus aimed at evaluating a pneumatic spray delivery (PSD)-SSCDS, first in the laboratory and then under field conditions, to understand system cleaning performance according to a methodology based on the ISO22368-1 (2004) standard for such fixed and semi-mobile sprayers. The cleaning performance was quantified as the percent amount of residue in the SSCDS components after the spray application. A pilot laboratory setup was used to evaluate the PSD-SSCDS component cleaning performance. The system was cleaned using five viable cleaning techniques: air injection for 30 (conventional cleaning technique), 60, 90, and 300 s, and one water rinse after 30 s air injection. The technique that performed best was field evaluated in a large-scale modern grapevine layout. Overall, the use of water to rinse the system component achieved cleaning performance >99.67%. Field trials also demonstrated that the PSD-SSCDS layout was easy to clean through a triple water rinse and capable of meeting the ISO16119-4 (2014) set threshold.
2024
67
4
1049
1063
https://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?aid=54967&t=3&dabs=Y&redir=&redirType=
Fixed spray delivery system, Internal cleaning, Pesticide application equipment, Pesticide residues, Spray application technology
Mozzanini, Eric; Bhalekar, Dattatray G.; Grella, Marco; Hoheisel, Gwen-Alyn; Samy, Shar; Balsari, Paolo; Gioelli, Fabrizio; Khot, Lav R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mozzanini et al ASABE 2024.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 3.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.01 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2010311
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact