This paper investigates the relationship between temporary workers and innovation. We model a firm’s choice concerning: (i) the mix of temporary and permanent workers; (ii) the optimal level of training intensity that firms choose by best-responding to the worker’s human capital investments. Results suggest that the innovation-enhancing combination of temporary and permanent workers exists and is unique. Using micro-data on Italian firms, we then find that the relationship between the firm-level share of temporary workers and innovation has indeed an inverted U form, in line with our theoretical expectations. This suggests that studies assuming a linear association may oversimplify the complex relationship between non-standard labor and innovation.
Are temporary hires good or bad for innovation? The Italian evidence
Stefano Dughera;Francesco Quatraro;
2024-01-01
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between temporary workers and innovation. We model a firm’s choice concerning: (i) the mix of temporary and permanent workers; (ii) the optimal level of training intensity that firms choose by best-responding to the worker’s human capital investments. Results suggest that the innovation-enhancing combination of temporary and permanent workers exists and is unique. Using micro-data on Italian firms, we then find that the relationship between the firm-level share of temporary workers and innovation has indeed an inverted U form, in line with our theoretical expectations. This suggests that studies assuming a linear association may oversimplify the complex relationship between non-standard labor and innovation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
9_Dughera_et_al_2023_AreTemporaryHiresGoodOrBadForInnovation.pdf
Accesso aperto con embargo fino al 01/06/2025
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
1.9 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.9 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.