BACKGROUND Pulsed field ablation (PFA) and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation are the most recently introduced technologies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The procedural performance, safety, and effectiveness of PFA vs vHPSD are currently unknown. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to compare PFA with vHPSD for the treatment of paroxysmal or persistent AF. METHODS We conducted an observational, multicenter study enrolling 534 consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years; 36% female) with paroxysmal (n = 368 [69%]) or persistent (n = 166 [31%]) AF undergoing ablation by either PFA (Farapulse; n = 192) or vHPSD (90 W/4 seconds; QDOT Micro; n = 342) between 2020 and 2023. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after a 1-month blanking period was the primary efficacy end point and was assessed both overall and in propensity score-matched patients. The primary safety end point was a composite of procedure-related complications. RESULTS Successful pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients, with shorter procedure duration (PFA,70 minutes; vHPSD, 100 minutes; P < .001) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA, 15 minutes; vHPSD, 7 minutes; P < .001) in the PFA group. PFA was associated with more frequent use of general anesthesia (P < .001). Primary safety outcome events occurred in 19 patients (3.5%), with similar prevalence in both groups (PFA, 4%; vHPSD, 3%; P = .745). After a median follow-up of 12 (9-12) months, survival free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar between the PFA and vHPSD groups, both overall (12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 76%; log-rank P = .73) and in propensity score-matched patients (n = 342; 12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 77%; log-rank P = .980). CONCLUSION In a large, multicenter experince, PFA was associated with more common use of general anesthesia, shorter procedural times, and longer fluoroscopy exposure compared with vHPSD ablation, with both techniques displaying superimposable safety and efficacy.
Pulsed field vs very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: Results of a multicenter, real-world experience
Anselmino, Matteo;
2024-01-01
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulsed field ablation (PFA) and very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency ablation are the most recently introduced technologies for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The procedural performance, safety, and effectiveness of PFA vs vHPSD are currently unknown. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to compare PFA with vHPSD for the treatment of paroxysmal or persistent AF. METHODS We conducted an observational, multicenter study enrolling 534 consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years; 36% female) with paroxysmal (n = 368 [69%]) or persistent (n = 166 [31%]) AF undergoing ablation by either PFA (Farapulse; n = 192) or vHPSD (90 W/4 seconds; QDOT Micro; n = 342) between 2020 and 2023. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence after a 1-month blanking period was the primary efficacy end point and was assessed both overall and in propensity score-matched patients. The primary safety end point was a composite of procedure-related complications. RESULTS Successful pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients, with shorter procedure duration (PFA,70 minutes; vHPSD, 100 minutes; P < .001) but longer fluoroscopy time (PFA, 15 minutes; vHPSD, 7 minutes; P < .001) in the PFA group. PFA was associated with more frequent use of general anesthesia (P < .001). Primary safety outcome events occurred in 19 patients (3.5%), with similar prevalence in both groups (PFA, 4%; vHPSD, 3%; P = .745). After a median follow-up of 12 (9-12) months, survival free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar between the PFA and vHPSD groups, both overall (12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 76%; log-rank P = .73) and in propensity score-matched patients (n = 342; 12-month estimate: PFA, 75%; vHPSD, 77%; log-rank P = .980). CONCLUSION In a large, multicenter experince, PFA was associated with more common use of general anesthesia, shorter procedural times, and longer fluoroscopy exposure compared with vHPSD ablation, with both techniques displaying superimposable safety and efficacy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ManuscriptR1 for iris.docx
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
12.13 MB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
12.13 MB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
ManuscriptR1+for+iris.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
784.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
784.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



