The International Staging System for multiple myeloma recently underwent a second revision (R2-ISS) to include gain/amplification of 1q21 and account for the additive prognostic significance of multiple high-risk features. The phase 3 ICARIA-MM (isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone vs. pomalidomide–dexamethasone) and IKEMA (isatuximab–carfilzomib–dexamethasone vs. carfilzomib–dexamethasone) studies provide large datasets for retrospectively validating the prognostic value of the R2-ISS in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Of 609 pooled patients, 68 (11.2%) were reclassified as R2-ISS stage I, 136 (22.3%) as R2-ISS stage II, 204 (33.5%) as R2-ISS stage III, 55 (9.0%) as stage IV, and 146 (24.0%) “Not classified”. Median progression-free survival was shorter among those reclassified as R2-ISS stage II (HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.979–2.358), stage III (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.709–3.923), and stage IV (HR 3.51, 95% CI 2.124–5.784) versus stage I. Adding isatuximab led to longer progression-free survival versus doublet therapy (adjusted HR 0.544 [95% CI 0.436–0.680]), with a consistent treatment effect observed across all R2-ISS stages. This is the first study to validate the R2-ISS with novel agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, and to show that R2-ISS, as a prognostic scoring system, can be applied to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Allocation and validation of the second revision of the International Staging System in the ICARIA-MM and IKEMA studies

D'Agostino, Mattia;
2024-01-01

Abstract

The International Staging System for multiple myeloma recently underwent a second revision (R2-ISS) to include gain/amplification of 1q21 and account for the additive prognostic significance of multiple high-risk features. The phase 3 ICARIA-MM (isatuximab–pomalidomide–dexamethasone vs. pomalidomide–dexamethasone) and IKEMA (isatuximab–carfilzomib–dexamethasone vs. carfilzomib–dexamethasone) studies provide large datasets for retrospectively validating the prognostic value of the R2-ISS in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Of 609 pooled patients, 68 (11.2%) were reclassified as R2-ISS stage I, 136 (22.3%) as R2-ISS stage II, 204 (33.5%) as R2-ISS stage III, 55 (9.0%) as stage IV, and 146 (24.0%) “Not classified”. Median progression-free survival was shorter among those reclassified as R2-ISS stage II (HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.979–2.358), stage III (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.709–3.923), and stage IV (HR 3.51, 95% CI 2.124–5.784) versus stage I. Adding isatuximab led to longer progression-free survival versus doublet therapy (adjusted HR 0.544 [95% CI 0.436–0.680]), with a consistent treatment effect observed across all R2-ISS stages. This is the first study to validate the R2-ISS with novel agents, including anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, and to show that R2-ISS, as a prognostic scoring system, can be applied to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
2024
14
1
1
11
Richardson, Paul G.; Perrot, Aurore; Mikhael, Joseph; Martin, Thomas; Beksac, Meral; Spicka, Ivan; Capra, Marcelo; D'Agostino, Mattia; Sonneveld, Piet...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
41408_2024_Article_1149.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 792.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
792.65 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2034572
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact