This article aims to test the different ways in which Giles of Rome’s theological heritage has been dealt with in the first three major authors of the “second Augustinian school”, this is to say Gregory of Rimini, Alphonsus Vargas, and Hugolinus of Orvieto. Based on the explicit quotations we find in their Sentences commentaries, we can notice that the situation is not at all the same in these masters: Giles of Rome is almost only an occasion for polemical discussions and criticism in the first two (in Alphonsus more than in Gregory); on the contrary, he is regarded as an important doctrinal source by Hugolinus.
"Sicut ait magister noster". Egidio Romano visto da tre maestri all'inizio della "seconda scuola agostiniana"
Amos Corbini
2024-01-01
Abstract
This article aims to test the different ways in which Giles of Rome’s theological heritage has been dealt with in the first three major authors of the “second Augustinian school”, this is to say Gregory of Rimini, Alphonsus Vargas, and Hugolinus of Orvieto. Based on the explicit quotations we find in their Sentences commentaries, we can notice that the situation is not at all the same in these masters: Giles of Rome is almost only an occasion for polemical discussions and criticism in the first two (in Alphonsus more than in Gregory); on the contrary, he is regarded as an important doctrinal source by Hugolinus.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Articolo SGA 2024.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
305.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
305.96 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.