Background and objective: Nodal metastasis is a major survival and prognostic factor in penile cancer (PeCa). Thus, accurate staging, prognosis, and treatment selection require adequate inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND). ILND surgery should balance oncologic rigor with morbidity and postoperative complications. Our aim was to compare the feasibility and safety of open ILND (OILND) and videoendoscopic ILND (VEILND) in patients with PeCa. Methods: We conducted a single-center randomized trial with a within-patient design between October 2019 and April 2023. Patients who were undergoing either staging or radical ILND for PeCa were included and randomized to receive either OILND or VEILND on one side, with the other technique then used on the contralateral side. The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05887921). The primary outcome was the safety of VEILND. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative morbidity rates and surgical outcomes for the two procedures, as well as oncological outcomes according to survival estimates. Key findings and limitations: We included 14 patients in the study. Median follow-up was 12 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 12–17). There were no significant differences in operative time and the number of lymph nodes removed between OILND and VEILND. However, the median time to drain removal was significantly shorter in the VEILND group (15 d, IQR 13–17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12–17) than in the OILND group (27 d, IQR 20–41, 95% CI 24–31; p = 0.025). No intraoperative complications were observed, but postoperative complications occurred in three cases (21.4%, 95% CI 8.4–37.8%) in the VEILND group and eight (57.1%, 95% CI 18.6–54.3%) in the OILND group (p = 0.032). Conclusions and clinical implications: VEILND represents a safe technique to consider for either staging or curative intent in PeCa and seems to have an advantage over OILND in terms of morbidity. Further high-powered studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary results. Patient summary: We compared the outcomes of two different surgical techniques to remove lymph nodes in patients with penile cancer. We found that a video-assisted keyhole surgery approach seems to result in a lower rate of complications than after open surgery.
Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Penile Cancer: An Interim Report from a Trial Comparing Open Versus Videoendoscopic Surgery Using a Within-patient Design
Falcone, Marco;Preto, Mirko;Cirigliano, Lorenzo;Scavone, Martina;Oderda, Marco;Gontero, Paolo
2024-01-01
Abstract
Background and objective: Nodal metastasis is a major survival and prognostic factor in penile cancer (PeCa). Thus, accurate staging, prognosis, and treatment selection require adequate inguinal lymphadenectomy (ILND). ILND surgery should balance oncologic rigor with morbidity and postoperative complications. Our aim was to compare the feasibility and safety of open ILND (OILND) and videoendoscopic ILND (VEILND) in patients with PeCa. Methods: We conducted a single-center randomized trial with a within-patient design between October 2019 and April 2023. Patients who were undergoing either staging or radical ILND for PeCa were included and randomized to receive either OILND or VEILND on one side, with the other technique then used on the contralateral side. The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05887921). The primary outcome was the safety of VEILND. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative morbidity rates and surgical outcomes for the two procedures, as well as oncological outcomes according to survival estimates. Key findings and limitations: We included 14 patients in the study. Median follow-up was 12 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 12–17). There were no significant differences in operative time and the number of lymph nodes removed between OILND and VEILND. However, the median time to drain removal was significantly shorter in the VEILND group (15 d, IQR 13–17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12–17) than in the OILND group (27 d, IQR 20–41, 95% CI 24–31; p = 0.025). No intraoperative complications were observed, but postoperative complications occurred in three cases (21.4%, 95% CI 8.4–37.8%) in the VEILND group and eight (57.1%, 95% CI 18.6–54.3%) in the OILND group (p = 0.032). Conclusions and clinical implications: VEILND represents a safe technique to consider for either staging or curative intent in PeCa and seems to have an advantage over OILND in terms of morbidity. Further high-powered studies are warranted to confirm these preliminary results. Patient summary: We compared the outcomes of two different surgical techniques to remove lymph nodes in patients with penile cancer. We found that a video-assisted keyhole surgery approach seems to result in a lower rate of complications than after open surgery.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
