COVID-19 pandemic led to the adoption of a different working approach: “The remote working.” Evidence about the association of remote working with stress outcomes and life quality is lacking. This systematic review provides an overview of the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on remote-workers’ stress and life quality. We conducted systematic literature searches in databases including Pubmed, Scopus and Web of science, from September 2020 to September 2023. Screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review highlighted possible predictors (work-family conflict or a condition of social isolation) associated with improvement or worsening of quality of life and stress. The results highlighted the association between stress and family difficulties (β: −0.02, P-value <0.05), isolation during the first (β: −0.22, P-value <0.05) and second pandemic waves (β: −0.40, P-value <0.05) or due to the advancing age of workers (β:0.19, P-value <0.05) and (β: −0.05, P-value <0.05), furthermore some job categories presented greater stress such as teachers (16.94 ± 5.46). Conversely, remote working positively affected life quality, enhancing factors such as creativity (Average Variance Extracted, AVE: 0.41, R2: 0.17) and self-efficacy (AVE: 0.60, R2: 0.36). Future research should focus more on the relationship between work and family and on interventions that counteract social isolation.

Remote workers’ life quality and stress during COVID-19: a systematic review

Carraro E.;Acquadro Maran D.;Filippetti S.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic led to the adoption of a different working approach: “The remote working.” Evidence about the association of remote working with stress outcomes and life quality is lacking. This systematic review provides an overview of the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on remote-workers’ stress and life quality. We conducted systematic literature searches in databases including Pubmed, Scopus and Web of science, from September 2020 to September 2023. Screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review highlighted possible predictors (work-family conflict or a condition of social isolation) associated with improvement or worsening of quality of life and stress. The results highlighted the association between stress and family difficulties (β: −0.02, P-value <0.05), isolation during the first (β: −0.22, P-value <0.05) and second pandemic waves (β: −0.40, P-value <0.05) or due to the advancing age of workers (β:0.19, P-value <0.05) and (β: −0.05, P-value <0.05), furthermore some job categories presented greater stress such as teachers (16.94 ± 5.46). Conversely, remote working positively affected life quality, enhancing factors such as creativity (Average Variance Extracted, AVE: 0.41, R2: 0.17) and self-efficacy (AVE: 0.60, R2: 0.36). Future research should focus more on the relationship between work and family and on interventions that counteract social isolation.
2025
35
1
1
141
https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/advance-article/doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckae167/8003706
remote working, work-related stress
Carraro E.; Rapisarda P.; Acquadro Maran D.; Filippetti S.; Palella M.; Pellegrino E.; Ferrante M.; La Torre G.; Fiore M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
review remote working.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo open access
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 737.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
737.04 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2055970
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact