The main aim of this paper is to resystematize the traditional discrete distinction between arguments and adjuncts within the cognitive continuum of subjectivity (Langacker 1990, 2007). From this perspective, the traditional discrete distinction between argument and adjuncts can be reinterpreted in a continuistic way (Mereu 2020). To achieve this, we will qualitatively analyse the behaviour of an Italian adverbial preposition of limitation, riguardo (a)NP ‘regarding NP’, showing how the different roles it assumes with respect to the argument structure can be traced back to a different subjective or objective construction of the relation it establishes.
For a cognitive continuum underlying the distinction between arguments and adjuncts
Buttinelli, Alessandro
2024-01-01
Abstract
The main aim of this paper is to resystematize the traditional discrete distinction between arguments and adjuncts within the cognitive continuum of subjectivity (Langacker 1990, 2007). From this perspective, the traditional discrete distinction between argument and adjuncts can be reinterpreted in a continuistic way (Mereu 2020). To achieve this, we will qualitatively analyse the behaviour of an Italian adverbial preposition of limitation, riguardo (a)NP ‘regarding NP’, showing how the different roles it assumes with respect to the argument structure can be traced back to a different subjective or objective construction of the relation it establishes.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The_verbal_kaleidoscope_open_11_Buttinelli_302-326.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
303.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
303.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



