The debate on criminal sanctions is today confined to dead-end dilemmas such as the one involving incapacitation and rehabilitation. Its empirical dimension remains largely unknown due to the absence of impact studies. The theoretical questions on the aim of punishment overlook a serious gap in terms of predictability and uniformity of the proportionality of punishment in our system. Time would be ripe to develop the nomophylactic effort of the Supreme Court of Cassation towards sentencing guidelines inspired by the principle of proportionality.

Neutralizzare e rieducare (pari sono, senza la proporzione)

consulich
2023-01-01

Abstract

The debate on criminal sanctions is today confined to dead-end dilemmas such as the one involving incapacitation and rehabilitation. Its empirical dimension remains largely unknown due to the absence of impact studies. The theoretical questions on the aim of punishment overlook a serious gap in terms of predictability and uniformity of the proportionality of punishment in our system. Time would be ripe to develop the nomophylactic effort of the Supreme Court of Cassation towards sentencing guidelines inspired by the principle of proportionality.
2023
107
138
criminal law, criminal sanction, functions and aims of punishment, predictability of sentencing, nomophilacy, sentencing guidelines, proportionality
consulich
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
consulich neutralizzare e rieducare pari sono criminalia 2023.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 522.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
522.67 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2058170
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact