The mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders has posed a significant challenge for judicial cooperation within the EU, primarily due to national disparities in substantive and procedural law. In an effort to harmonise this domain and mitigate “implementation issues”, the Union adopted Regulation (EU) 2018/1805. Despite this milestone, some Member States have decided to implement concurrent national rules on the matter. This article will show how the individual policies risk undermining the overarching objective.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1805: A Step Forward with Some Criticalities
laura scomparin;oscar calavita
2025-01-01
Abstract
The mutual recognition of freezing and confiscation orders has posed a significant challenge for judicial cooperation within the EU, primarily due to national disparities in substantive and procedural law. In an effort to harmonise this domain and mitigate “implementation issues”, the Union adopted Regulation (EU) 2018/1805. Despite this milestone, some Member States have decided to implement concurrent national rules on the matter. This article will show how the individual policies risk undermining the overarching objective.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
31. Regulation EU 2018-1805. A step forward with some criticalities.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Regulation (EU) 2018/1805: a step forward with some criticalities
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
301.75 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
301.75 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
