Background: Relative age effects (RAEs) refer to the overrepresentation of athletes born earlier in a selection year and may influence talent identification in sport. While RAEs are well-documented in male cricket, limited research exists in the female game. Purpose: To examine the prevalence of RAEs across the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) women's and girls' national talent pathway, from youth to senior levels. Research Design: A cross-sectional design comparing observed and expected birthdate distributions. Study Sample: Data were collected for 289 players from six cohorts: Regional Festivals (n = 108), School Games (n = 48), England U19 World Cup Squad (n = 15), and senior national squads-T20 (n = 47), ODI (n = 41), and Test (n = 30). Data Collection and/or Analysis: Players' birthdates were categorised into quartiles based on the UK academic year. Chi-square tests and odds ratios (95% CIs) were used to assess RAEs by cohort and skill set (batters, bowlers). Transitions from youth to senior levels were also examined. Results: Significant RAEs were identified in all youth cohorts, with relatively older players overrepresented. In contrast, senior cohorts showed a reversal effect, with relatively younger players more prevalent, particularly among those who played more matches. These patterns were evident across both batters and bowlers. Conclusions: RAEs are present in the ECB women's and girls' talent pathway, suggesting selection biases that may hinder long-term development. Stakeholders should implement strategies to create a more equitable pathway and support all players in realising their potential.

Relative Age Effects in Women’s and Girls’ Cricket

Brustio, Paolo Riccardo;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Relative age effects (RAEs) refer to the overrepresentation of athletes born earlier in a selection year and may influence talent identification in sport. While RAEs are well-documented in male cricket, limited research exists in the female game. Purpose: To examine the prevalence of RAEs across the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) women's and girls' national talent pathway, from youth to senior levels. Research Design: A cross-sectional design comparing observed and expected birthdate distributions. Study Sample: Data were collected for 289 players from six cohorts: Regional Festivals (n = 108), School Games (n = 48), England U19 World Cup Squad (n = 15), and senior national squads-T20 (n = 47), ODI (n = 41), and Test (n = 30). Data Collection and/or Analysis: Players' birthdates were categorised into quartiles based on the UK academic year. Chi-square tests and odds ratios (95% CIs) were used to assess RAEs by cohort and skill set (batters, bowlers). Transitions from youth to senior levels were also examined. Results: Significant RAEs were identified in all youth cohorts, with relatively older players overrepresented. In contrast, senior cohorts showed a reversal effect, with relatively younger players more prevalent, particularly among those who played more matches. These patterns were evident across both batters and bowlers. Conclusions: RAEs are present in the ECB women's and girls' talent pathway, suggesting selection biases that may hinder long-term development. Stakeholders should implement strategies to create a more equitable pathway and support all players in realising their potential.
2025
1
23
batting; bowling; expertise; talent development; talent identification; youth cricket
McAuley, Alexander B. T.; Radnor, John M.; Reed, Rob; de la Rubia, Alfonso; Brustio, Paolo Riccardo; Jiménez-Sáiz, Sergio L.; Kelly, Adam L....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
McAuley et al. (2025) relative Age Effects in Women_s and Girl_ Cricket.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 695.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
695.63 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2076170
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact