In Isnardi Parente’s re-edition of Xenocrates’ fragments (2012), in the commentary to fr. 126 we read that the information reported ‘indicates the departure by Xenocrates and presumably the Academy from Plato’s tripartite psychology’ (my translation). This paper offers an analysis of fr. 126 IP2 and the information ascribed to Xenocrates by Theodoret. The aim is to show that an attentive examination of the information preserved does not allow us to determine whether Xenocrates and the Academy did, in fact, abandon Plato’s tripartite psychology.

Il fr. 126 IP2 di Senocrate e l’ipotesi di bipartizione dell’anima nell’Academia antica

Giulia De Cesaris
2024-01-01

Abstract

In Isnardi Parente’s re-edition of Xenocrates’ fragments (2012), in the commentary to fr. 126 we read that the information reported ‘indicates the departure by Xenocrates and presumably the Academy from Plato’s tripartite psychology’ (my translation). This paper offers an analysis of fr. 126 IP2 and the information ascribed to Xenocrates by Theodoret. The aim is to show that an attentive examination of the information preserved does not allow us to determine whether Xenocrates and the Academy did, in fact, abandon Plato’s tripartite psychology.
2024
38
31
44
Xenocrates, Psychology, Soul, Bipartition, Tripartition
Giulia De Cesaris
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
De Cesaris - Bipartizione dell_Anima nell_Academia Antica.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.11 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.11 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2082053
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact