Monitoring and evaluation of integrated One Health surveillance is essential to ensure an efficient allocation of resources, the achievement of surveillance goals and to ensure that all stakeholders assume their roles and responsibilities. Several evaluation tools are available, which differ in their approaches, user-friendliness, comprehensiveness. We here present the experience of evaluating the degree of One Health implementation of integrated surveillance plans for antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), with special reference to ClassyFarm, the Italian system implemented to monitor AMU and AMR in livestock farms.
Evaluating One Health
Laura Tomassone;Daniele De Meneghi
2024-01-01
Abstract
Monitoring and evaluation of integrated One Health surveillance is essential to ensure an efficient allocation of resources, the achievement of surveillance goals and to ensure that all stakeholders assume their roles and responsibilities. Several evaluation tools are available, which differ in their approaches, user-friendliness, comprehensiveness. We here present the experience of evaluating the degree of One Health implementation of integrated surveillance plans for antimicrobial use (AMU) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), with special reference to ClassyFarm, the Italian system implemented to monitor AMU and AMR in livestock farms.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluating One Health.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
1.51 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.51 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



