Background and aims: Drug positioning in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is still debated. In a nationwide multicentre observational cohort, we aimed to compare the real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as second-line for UC after anti-TNFs. Methods: Disease activity was evaluated at weeks 8, 26, and 52 ± 4. The primary outcome was to compare clinical remission (partial Mayo score (PMS) ≤2 with no subscore >1) at week 26. Secondary outcomes included comparative effectiveness for corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR); biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic remission; combined corticosteroid-free clinical-objective remission; and treatment persistence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for all comparisons. Results: Overall, 134 tofacitinib- and 277 vedolizumab-treated UC patients were included. At week 26, no difference was observed between tofacitinib and vedolizumab for clinical remission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.9; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.6 – 1.6). At week 8, tofacitinib was more effective in achieving CFCR (aOR: 1.7; 95 % CI: 1.0 – 2.7). Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes showed no difference between tofacitinib and vedolizumab at weeks 26 and 52. In patients with baseline PMS ≥ 2, steroid use, or anti-TNF non-response no difference was found for clinical remission at week 26. Tofacitinib-treated patients were more likely to discontinue treatment (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.8; 95 % CI: 1.2 – 2.8). Safety was consistent with treatment profiles in UC. Conclusions: Tofacitinib and vedolizumab were equally effective and safe as second-line therapy in anti-TNFs experienced UC patients. Tofacitinib showed greater efficacy in inducing CFCR at week 8, but carried higher discontinuation risk.

Real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as 2nd-line for ulcerative colitis after anti-TNFs: A multicenter cohort IGIBD study (VE2TO-UC)

Ribaldone D. G.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background and aims: Drug positioning in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is still debated. In a nationwide multicentre observational cohort, we aimed to compare the real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as second-line for UC after anti-TNFs. Methods: Disease activity was evaluated at weeks 8, 26, and 52 ± 4. The primary outcome was to compare clinical remission (partial Mayo score (PMS) ≤2 with no subscore >1) at week 26. Secondary outcomes included comparative effectiveness for corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR); biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic remission; combined corticosteroid-free clinical-objective remission; and treatment persistence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for all comparisons. Results: Overall, 134 tofacitinib- and 277 vedolizumab-treated UC patients were included. At week 26, no difference was observed between tofacitinib and vedolizumab for clinical remission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.9; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.6 – 1.6). At week 8, tofacitinib was more effective in achieving CFCR (aOR: 1.7; 95 % CI: 1.0 – 2.7). Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes showed no difference between tofacitinib and vedolizumab at weeks 26 and 52. In patients with baseline PMS ≥ 2, steroid use, or anti-TNF non-response no difference was found for clinical remission at week 26. Tofacitinib-treated patients were more likely to discontinue treatment (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.8; 95 % CI: 1.2 – 2.8). Safety was consistent with treatment profiles in UC. Conclusions: Tofacitinib and vedolizumab were equally effective and safe as second-line therapy in anti-TNFs experienced UC patients. Tofacitinib showed greater efficacy in inducing CFCR at week 8, but carried higher discontinuation risk.
2025
57
7
1419
1427
Effectiveness; Real word evidence; Safety; Tofacitinib; Ulcerative colitis; Vedolizumab
Noviello D.; Fries W.; Orlando A.; Conforti F.S.; Bezzio C.; Castiglione F.; Fantini M.C.; Savarino E.V.; Festa S.; Ribaldone D.G.; Mocci G.; Grossi L...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
VE2TO-UC_manuscript.docx

Accesso aperto con embargo fino al 01/08/2026

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 299.87 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
299.87 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2087371
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact