The Supreme Court’s judgement in question is likely to represent a cornerstone of the forthcoming jurisprudential elaboration of fault in complex organizations of a public nature. Inadequate planning concretizes the public exponent’s reproach and plural are the intersections caught between individual and structurally collective plan of imputation. Entity liability, even to this day ‘silent’ in the public sphere, begins to ‘speak’ to the official of the administration, providing him with a reservoir of expendable cautions to fill his personal preventative duties with meaning.
DISASTRI EVITABILI E FORME DELLA COLPA NELL’ORGANIZZAZIONE PUBBLICA
consulich
2025-01-01
Abstract
The Supreme Court’s judgement in question is likely to represent a cornerstone of the forthcoming jurisprudential elaboration of fault in complex organizations of a public nature. Inadequate planning concretizes the public exponent’s reproach and plural are the intersections caught between individual and structurally collective plan of imputation. Entity liability, even to this day ‘silent’ in the public sphere, begins to ‘speak’ to the official of the administration, providing him with a reservoir of expendable cautions to fill his personal preventative duties with meaning.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cassazione penale 9 2025 rigopiano.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
1.34 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.34 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



