Implant-based reconstruction is the most performed breast reconstruction, and both subpectoral and prepectoral approaches can lead to excellent results. Choosing the best procedure requires a thorough understanding of every single technique, and proper patient selection is critical to achieve surgical success, in particular when dealing with prepectoral breast reconstruction.

"To Pre or Not to Pre": introduction of a prepectoral breast reconstruction assessment score to help surgeons solving the decision-making dilemma. Retrospective results of a multicenter experience

Casella, Donato
First
;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Implant-based reconstruction is the most performed breast reconstruction, and both subpectoral and prepectoral approaches can lead to excellent results. Choosing the best procedure requires a thorough understanding of every single technique, and proper patient selection is critical to achieve surgical success, in particular when dealing with prepectoral breast reconstruction.
2021
147
6
1278
1286
https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/abstract/2021/06000/_to_pre_or_not_to_pre___introduction_of_a.4.aspx
Adult; Aged; Aged; 80 and over; Breast Implantation; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Middle Aged; Pectoralis Muscles; Retrospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tissue Expansion; Clinical Decision-Making; Patient Selection
Casella, Donato; Kaciulyte, Juste; Lo Torto, Federico; Mori, Francesco L R; Barellini, Leonardo; Fausto, Alfonso; Fanelli, Benedetta; Greco, Manfredi;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
19.2 “To Pre or Not to Pre” pdf.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 781.86 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
781.86 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2102251
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact