This article analyses the two endings of the two recensions of the Paschal homily In mulieres unguentiferas. The first, securely attributable to Gregory of Antioch, concludes with a mystagogical and Eucharistic peroratio. The second, which I propose to ascribe to his successor Anastasius, ends with a catechumenal exhortation characterised by a chain of imperatives, the baptism-sphragis sequence, and the citation of Ps 31(32), 1. These elements reflect late antique catechetical traditions and support its attribution to Anastasius rather than to a later Byzantine reworking.
The Two Recensions of the Homily In mulieres unguentiferas: The Question of Its Two Endings
Rocco Schembra
2025-01-01
Abstract
This article analyses the two endings of the two recensions of the Paschal homily In mulieres unguentiferas. The first, securely attributable to Gregory of Antioch, concludes with a mystagogical and Eucharistic peroratio. The second, which I propose to ascribe to his successor Anastasius, ends with a catechumenal exhortation characterised by a chain of imperatives, the baptism-sphragis sequence, and the citation of Ps 31(32), 1. These elements reflect late antique catechetical traditions and support its attribution to Anastasius rather than to a later Byzantine reworking.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MEG 26.Schembra Rocco.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
304.78 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
304.78 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



