Structures are ubiquitous in mathematics. But how should they be understood? Modelists claim they are model-theoretic structures. This thesis can be read in two ways: as a claim about what structures refer to, or about how we conceptualize them. Objects-modelism, developed by Button and Walsh [2018], pursues the first; the second leads to concepts-modelism, which remains underexplored. In this paper we develop and defend a version of concepts-modelism, cognitive modelism, drawing on Carey’s (2009) theory of conceptual development, and we show how it addresses the challenges Button and Walsh pose for a conceptual account of mathematical structures.
Cognitive Modelism
Lorenzo Rossi
2026-01-01
Abstract
Structures are ubiquitous in mathematics. But how should they be understood? Modelists claim they are model-theoretic structures. This thesis can be read in two ways: as a claim about what structures refer to, or about how we conceptualize them. Objects-modelism, developed by Button and Walsh [2018], pursues the first; the second leads to concepts-modelism, which remains underexplored. In this paper we develop and defend a version of concepts-modelism, cognitive modelism, drawing on Carey’s (2009) theory of conceptual development, and we show how it addresses the challenges Button and Walsh pose for a conceptual account of mathematical structures.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
cognitive_modelism-final.pdf
Accesso aperto
Dimensione
451.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
451.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
PM_acceptance_letter.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Acceptance letter
Dimensione
145.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
145.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
nkaf027.pdf
Accesso aperto
Dimensione
511.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
511.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



