Despite significant government interventions over the past five decades in Brazil, the adoption of ethanol as an alternative to gasoline remains well below the expected level. We utilise a novel dataset that covers all municipalities with operational gas stations, including data on ethanol and gasoline consumption, prices, socio-demographics, and state characteristics, to assess the impact of economic, demographic, and local factors (in the period 2020/9–2021/12), and to investigate the factors influencing fuel choice and the likely existence of barriers to ethanol adoption. Results indicate that non-economic factors, including education and age, influence ethanol adoption. State-level fiscal policies and economic vocations, such as sugarcane and oil production, also influence adoption. We argue that policies should go beyond traditional economic incentives and, instead, take a more comprehensive approach that addresses local conditions and promotes pro-social behaviours. In this vein, we propose several policy interventions inspired by behavioral economics to increase adoption, particularly among wealthier, younger, and less-educated citizens. Ultimately, the study recommends further research into the social and cognitive factors that influence fuel choice and the effectiveness of policy.
Ethanol vs. gasoline: conventional policies and the slow uptake
Fontana, MagdaCo-first
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Despite significant government interventions over the past five decades in Brazil, the adoption of ethanol as an alternative to gasoline remains well below the expected level. We utilise a novel dataset that covers all municipalities with operational gas stations, including data on ethanol and gasoline consumption, prices, socio-demographics, and state characteristics, to assess the impact of economic, demographic, and local factors (in the period 2020/9–2021/12), and to investigate the factors influencing fuel choice and the likely existence of barriers to ethanol adoption. Results indicate that non-economic factors, including education and age, influence ethanol adoption. State-level fiscal policies and economic vocations, such as sugarcane and oil production, also influence adoption. We argue that policies should go beyond traditional economic incentives and, instead, take a more comprehensive approach that addresses local conditions and promotes pro-social behaviours. In this vein, we propose several policy interventions inspired by behavioral economics to increase adoption, particularly among wealthier, younger, and less-educated citizens. Ultimately, the study recommends further research into the social and cognitive factors that influence fuel choice and the effectiveness of policy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
JEPO115009.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
4.84 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.84 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



