In this paper, I want to show that at least two of the three reasons Wollheim pro- vides in order to show that Jasper Johns’ Flag is not the object of a proper seeing-in experience are correct. By means of the very same reasons, one may also show that some other paintings by Johns that are in the vicinity of Flag are instead the objects of a proper seeing-in experience. Since that experience is for Wollheim the mark of pictoriality, this exploration once more shows what the limits of depiction.

The Limitations of Depiction: The Flag Problem

Voltolini A.
2025-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, I want to show that at least two of the three reasons Wollheim pro- vides in order to show that Jasper Johns’ Flag is not the object of a proper seeing-in experience are correct. By means of the very same reasons, one may also show that some other paintings by Johns that are in the vicinity of Flag are instead the objects of a proper seeing-in experience. Since that experience is for Wollheim the mark of pictoriality, this exploration once more shows what the limits of depiction.
2025
1
21
https://debatesinaesthetics.org/debates-in-aesthetics-vol-20-
depiction; seeing-in; seeing-as
Voltolini A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The Flag Problem.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 880.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
880.29 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2114150
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact