Background: The timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration may influence clinical outcomes, incidence, and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 41 patients with advanced melanoma treated with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab at the Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana between 2018 and 2024. Infusions completed before 2:00 p.m. were classified as morning (AM). Patients receiving >= 50% of doses in the morning were assigned to the AM group; the remaining patients comprised the afternoon (PM) group. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the AM group and twenty in the PM group. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the AM group, compared with 7.8 months in the PM group (univariate HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.70; p = 0.006). Overall survival (OS) was also significantly improved in the AM group (univariate HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.80; p = 0.019). The overall incidence of irAEs was similar between groups. However, systemic immunosuppression for grade >= 2 toxicities was more frequently required in the PM group (80% vs. 52%, p = 0.06). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, morning administration of ICIs was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced melanoma. While irAE incidence was comparable between groups, patients treated in the afternoon more often required systemic immunosuppression.

ChronoimmunoTOX: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study on How the Time of Administration Impacts Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy and Toxicity in Melanoma

Nepote, Alessandro;Saporita, Isabella;Sangiolo, Dario;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: The timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration may influence clinical outcomes, incidence, and severity of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), but evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 41 patients with advanced melanoma treated with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab at the Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana between 2018 and 2024. Infusions completed before 2:00 p.m. were classified as morning (AM). Patients receiving >= 50% of doses in the morning were assigned to the AM group; the remaining patients comprised the afternoon (PM) group. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the AM group and twenty in the PM group. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the AM group, compared with 7.8 months in the PM group (univariate HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.70; p = 0.006). Overall survival (OS) was also significantly improved in the AM group (univariate HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.80; p = 0.019). The overall incidence of irAEs was similar between groups. However, systemic immunosuppression for grade >= 2 toxicities was more frequently required in the PM group (80% vs. 52%, p = 0.06). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, morning administration of ICIs was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with advanced melanoma. While irAE incidence was comparable between groups, patients treated in the afternoon more often required systemic immunosuppression.
2025
15
1
1
16
Anti PD-1; Chronoimmunotherapy; anti CTLA-4; immune adverse events; melanoma
Nepote, Alessandro; Burghgraeve, Gilles; Pedrani, Martino; Gomez Ramos, Anderson Junior; Saporita, Isabella; Spataro, Vito; Espeli, Vittoria; Pereira ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-15-00069.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 831.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
831.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2117287
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact