Methylformate (MF) and glycolaldehyde (GA) are two primogenital organic molecules detected in both cold and warm regions of the interstellar medium (ISM). Both gas-phase and grain-surface pathways have been proposed to explain their abundances, yet uncertainties remain, since prevailing grain-surface mechanisms favor the formation of GA over MF, which mismatch observations in different ISM regions. In this work, MF and GA synthetic reactions are atomistically modeled on surfaces containing variable H (Formula presented.) O and CO percentages (interstellar dirty ices), in which one of the reactants coming from the gas phase reacts with an icy CO, thus adopting the following two-step "radical + ice" mechanism: for MF, OCH (Formula presented.) + (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) COOCH (Formula presented.) + H (Formula presented.) HCOOCH (Formula presented.); for GA, CH (Formula presented.) OH + (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) COCH (Formula presented.) OH + H (Formula presented.) HCOCH (Formula presented.) OH. Calculations show that the first step presents an energy barrier (32–38 kJ mol (Formula presented.) for MF and 17–20 kJ mol (Formula presented.) for GA), while the second step is nearly barrierless. Although the energetics favor GA formation, the observed abundances are better explained by desorption phenomena rather than reaction barriers are argued. Specifically, the weaker binding energies of MF (16.8–46.1 kJ mol (Formula presented.)) than GA (28.4–90.2 kJ mol (Formula presented.)) support its higher abundance in the ISM.

Atomistic Modeling of Methyl Formate and Glycolaldehyde Formation on Interstellar Dirty Ice Mantles via a “Radical + Ice” Mechanism

Perrero, Jessica;Pantaleone, Stefano;Ugliengo, Piero;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Methylformate (MF) and glycolaldehyde (GA) are two primogenital organic molecules detected in both cold and warm regions of the interstellar medium (ISM). Both gas-phase and grain-surface pathways have been proposed to explain their abundances, yet uncertainties remain, since prevailing grain-surface mechanisms favor the formation of GA over MF, which mismatch observations in different ISM regions. In this work, MF and GA synthetic reactions are atomistically modeled on surfaces containing variable H (Formula presented.) O and CO percentages (interstellar dirty ices), in which one of the reactants coming from the gas phase reacts with an icy CO, thus adopting the following two-step "radical + ice" mechanism: for MF, OCH (Formula presented.) + (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) COOCH (Formula presented.) + H (Formula presented.) HCOOCH (Formula presented.); for GA, CH (Formula presented.) OH + (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) COCH (Formula presented.) OH + H (Formula presented.) HCOCH (Formula presented.) OH. Calculations show that the first step presents an energy barrier (32–38 kJ mol (Formula presented.) for MF and 17–20 kJ mol (Formula presented.) for GA), while the second step is nearly barrierless. Although the energetics favor GA formation, the observed abundances are better explained by desorption phenomena rather than reaction barriers are argued. Specifically, the weaker binding energies of MF (16.8–46.1 kJ mol (Formula presented.)) than GA (28.4–90.2 kJ mol (Formula presented.)) support its higher abundance in the ISM.
2025
90
11
1
13
ab initio calculations; astrochemistry; interstellar medium; reaction mechanisms; surface chemistry
Perrero, Jessica; Pantaleone, Stefano; Ugliengo, Piero; Rimola, Albert
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
7-ChemPlusChem - 2025 - Perrero - Atomistic Modeling of Methyl Formate and Glycolaldehyde Formation on Interstellar Dirty Ice.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.83 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.83 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2117872
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact