The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different decontamination treatments on the surface roughness and elemental deposition of pristine dental implants using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). We divided 110 dental implants into 21 groups based on the decontamination method used in vitro. One group was the untreated control. Roughness values (Ra) were analyzed with a profilometer, while elemental deposition was assessed through EDS. Results were obtained for each treatment and for macrogroups (control, ultrasound, curettes, powders, brushes, gels). Significantly lower Ra values were found in the neck zone with respect to the thread zone (p < 0.05). EDS analysis revealed a non-significant higher presence of carbon and calcium in certain treatments, denoting a certain deposition of the decontaminating products (p > 0.05). Although there were various significant differences among the groups, roughness values were low and no decontaminating methods macroscopically affected implant surfaces, so decontaminating procedures can be considered safe.

SEM/EDS and Roughness Analysis on Current Titanium Implant Decontamination Systems: In Vitro Study

Alovisi M.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different decontamination treatments on the surface roughness and elemental deposition of pristine dental implants using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). We divided 110 dental implants into 21 groups based on the decontamination method used in vitro. One group was the untreated control. Roughness values (Ra) were analyzed with a profilometer, while elemental deposition was assessed through EDS. Results were obtained for each treatment and for macrogroups (control, ultrasound, curettes, powders, brushes, gels). Significantly lower Ra values were found in the neck zone with respect to the thread zone (p < 0.05). EDS analysis revealed a non-significant higher presence of carbon and calcium in certain treatments, denoting a certain deposition of the decontaminating products (p > 0.05). Although there were various significant differences among the groups, roughness values were low and no decontaminating methods macroscopically affected implant surfaces, so decontaminating procedures can be considered safe.
2025
15
10
1
19
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/15/10/1114
dental hygiene; implant; peri-implant mucositis; SEM/EDS; surface roughness
Lattari M.; Butera A.; Roatti S.; Pascadopoli M.; Alberti B.; Cosola S.; Alovisi M.; Scribante A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
coatings-15-01114-v2.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Coatings 2025, 15(10), 1114
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 6.54 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.54 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2119308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact