Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have distinct pathologies but frequently overlapping clinical presentations, making early and atypical differential diagnosis challenging. Blood-based biomarkers offer a minimally invasive alternative to cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging measures, yet their diagnostic performance-alone and in combination-remains to be fully established.ObjectiveTo quantify the discriminative ability of plasma biomarkers for differentiating AD, FTD, and healthy controls (HC).Methods: We used a fully Bayesian classification framework, estimating Bayesian logistic regression models for all single, pairwise, and triplet combinations of six plasma biomarkers-phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (pTau217), brain-derived tau (BD-Tau), neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), amyloid-β40 (Aβ40), and amyloid-β42 (Aβ42)-in AD (n = 97), FTD (n = 255), and HC (n = 70). Models were fitted across three contrasts (AD versus HC, FTD versus HC, AD versus FTD) and evaluated via posterior distributions of cross-validated AUC, precision, recall, F1 score, and Brier score. Results: Across 41 candidate models, NfL was the top single biomarker (mean AUC = 0.85), achieving strong discrimination for FTD versus HC (AUC = 0.94). The best two-marker panel (pTau217 + NfL) improved AD versus HC (AUC = 0.96) and AD versus FTD (AUC = 0.90). Adding Aβ42 produced the highest-ranked triplet (AUC = 0.95) with modest, consistent gains. Posterior coefficients were biologically coherent (AD-specific pTau217 effects; severity-linked NfL), and calibration was satisfactory, with minor overconfidence only at extreme probabilities. Conclusions: A parsimonious pTau217 + NfL panel captures most diagnostic information in the full plasma profile, providing an accurate probabilistic classifier with interpretable uncertainty to support differential diagnosis and clinical triage in precision neurology.
A Bayesian classification model for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using plasma biomarkers
Costa, TommasoFirst
;Liloia, Donato
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) have distinct pathologies but frequently overlapping clinical presentations, making early and atypical differential diagnosis challenging. Blood-based biomarkers offer a minimally invasive alternative to cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging measures, yet their diagnostic performance-alone and in combination-remains to be fully established.ObjectiveTo quantify the discriminative ability of plasma biomarkers for differentiating AD, FTD, and healthy controls (HC).Methods: We used a fully Bayesian classification framework, estimating Bayesian logistic regression models for all single, pairwise, and triplet combinations of six plasma biomarkers-phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (pTau217), brain-derived tau (BD-Tau), neurofilament light chain (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), amyloid-β40 (Aβ40), and amyloid-β42 (Aβ42)-in AD (n = 97), FTD (n = 255), and HC (n = 70). Models were fitted across three contrasts (AD versus HC, FTD versus HC, AD versus FTD) and evaluated via posterior distributions of cross-validated AUC, precision, recall, F1 score, and Brier score. Results: Across 41 candidate models, NfL was the top single biomarker (mean AUC = 0.85), achieving strong discrimination for FTD versus HC (AUC = 0.94). The best two-marker panel (pTau217 + NfL) improved AD versus HC (AUC = 0.96) and AD versus FTD (AUC = 0.90). Adding Aβ42 produced the highest-ranked triplet (AUC = 0.95) with modest, consistent gains. Posterior coefficients were biologically coherent (AD-specific pTau217 effects; severity-linked NfL), and calibration was satisfactory, with minor overconfidence only at extreme probabilities. Conclusions: A parsimonious pTau217 + NfL panel captures most diagnostic information in the full plasma profile, providing an accurate probabilistic classifier with interpretable uncertainty to support differential diagnosis and clinical triage in precision neurology.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
costa-et-al-2026-a-bayesian-classification-model-for-differential-diagnosis-of-alzheimer-s-disease-and-frontotemporal.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
1.49 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.49 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



