Purpose: Many studies have investigated postural reactions (PR) to body-delivered perturbations. However, attention has been focused on the descriptive variables of the PR rather than on the characterization of the perturbation. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the impulse rather than the force magnitude of the perturbation mostly affects the PR in terms of displacement of the center of foot pressure (ΔCoP). Methods: Fourteen healthy young adults (7 males and 7 females) received 2 series of 20 perturbations, delivered to the back in the anterior direction, at mid-scapular level, while standing on a force platform. In one series, the perturbations had the same force magnitude (40 N) but different impulse (range: 2-10 Ns). In the other series, the perturbations had the same impulse (5 Ns) but different force magnitude (20-100 N). A simple model of postural control restricted to the sagittal plane was also developed. Results: The results showed that ΔCoP and impulse were highly correlated (on average: r = 0.96), while the correlation ΔCoP-force magnitude was poor (r = 0.48) and not statistically significant in most subjects. The normalized response, ΔCoPn = ΔCoP/I, was independent of the perturbation magnitude in a wide range of force amplitude and impulse and exhibited good repeatability across different sets of stimuli (on average: ICC = 0.88). These results were confirmed by simulations. Conclusion: The present findings support the concept that the magnitude of the applied force alone is a poor descriptor of trunk-delivered perturbations and suggest that the impulse should be considered instead.

Effects of anthropometry, age and sex on center of pressure displacement evoked by small trunk perturbations in balance tests

Roatta, Silvestro
Last
2026-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: Many studies have investigated postural reactions (PR) to body-delivered perturbations. However, attention has been focused on the descriptive variables of the PR rather than on the characterization of the perturbation. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the impulse rather than the force magnitude of the perturbation mostly affects the PR in terms of displacement of the center of foot pressure (ΔCoP). Methods: Fourteen healthy young adults (7 males and 7 females) received 2 series of 20 perturbations, delivered to the back in the anterior direction, at mid-scapular level, while standing on a force platform. In one series, the perturbations had the same force magnitude (40 N) but different impulse (range: 2-10 Ns). In the other series, the perturbations had the same impulse (5 Ns) but different force magnitude (20-100 N). A simple model of postural control restricted to the sagittal plane was also developed. Results: The results showed that ΔCoP and impulse were highly correlated (on average: r = 0.96), while the correlation ΔCoP-force magnitude was poor (r = 0.48) and not statistically significant in most subjects. The normalized response, ΔCoPn = ΔCoP/I, was independent of the perturbation magnitude in a wide range of force amplitude and impulse and exhibited good repeatability across different sets of stimuli (on average: ICC = 0.88). These results were confirmed by simulations. Conclusion: The present findings support the concept that the magnitude of the applied force alone is a poor descriptor of trunk-delivered perturbations and suggest that the impulse should be considered instead.
2026
1
12
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00421-026-06210-z
Balance control; Center of pressure; Human balance modeling; Postural reaction; Posturography; Stability
Paterna, Maria; Alba, Francesca; Bottoni, Emiliano; De Benedictis, Carlo; Maffiodo, Daniela; Franco, Walter; Dvir, Zeevi; Ferraresi, Carlo; Roatta, Si...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2026 Paterna et al, EJAP, Effect of anthropometry on CoP displacements- ONLINE.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.68 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2134930
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact