In Kolin and in Qingdao, the Court of Justice reasserted the exclusive competence of EU institutions to conclude trade agreements, including in the area of public procurement. Consequently, a Member State may neither allow nor exclude participation from non-covered third country economic operators to their award procedures. The choice is left to contract-ing authorities and entities, who are, however, left with no real guidance for dealing with those economic operators. The uncertainty further extends to the possible judicial review of award decisions.

Third Country Tenders and the Public Contract Market: The Court of Justice's Good Intentions Lead Buyers to Hell

Roberto Caranta
2026-01-01

Abstract

In Kolin and in Qingdao, the Court of Justice reasserted the exclusive competence of EU institutions to conclude trade agreements, including in the area of public procurement. Consequently, a Member State may neither allow nor exclude participation from non-covered third country economic operators to their award procedures. The choice is left to contract-ing authorities and entities, who are, however, left with no real guidance for dealing with those economic operators. The uncertainty further extends to the possible judicial review of award decisions.
2026
1
65
75
procurement, third country economic operators, case law
Roberto Caranta
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EPPPL case note Caranta.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.57 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2139196
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact