Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
Background: Blood eosinophils (EOS) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are potential biomarkers for disease progression and treatment response in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated their association with exacerbations in asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD. Methods: NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY is a multicountry prospective study of patients with physician-assigned asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD. Negative binomial and logistic regression analyses were performed for baseline EOS/FeNO (separately and combined), by diagnosis, and for different exacerbation subtypes (all, antibiotics-only, oral corticosteroids (OCS)-only). Results: Higher baseline EOS was significantly associated with increased risk of all exacerbations in asthma (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18, p=0.033), with a trend increase with COPD (IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19, p=0.069) but not asthma+COPD. Higher baseline FeNO was significantly associated with decreased risk of all exacerbations in COPD (IRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99, p=0.025) and increased risk of OCS-only exacerbations in asthma (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.29, p=0.006) and asthma+COPD (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.97, p<0.001). In exacerbation risk in asthma (IRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24, p=0.003), while in COPD, both higher EOS (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.24, p=0.033) and lower FeNO (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96, p=0.009) were independently associated with exacerbation risk. Conclusions: Higher EOS predicted exacerbations in asthma and COPD, while FeNO showed heterogeneous associations, particularly for OCS-only treated exacerbations. Assessment of exacerbation subtype might improve personalised management. Interpretation is limited by physician-assigned diagnoses, potential ICS confounding and recall bias.
Association of blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide with exacerbations in patients with asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD: the NOVELTY study
Background: Blood eosinophils (EOS) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are potential biomarkers for disease progression and treatment response in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated their association with exacerbations in asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD. Methods: NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY is a multicountry prospective study of patients with physician-assigned asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD. Negative binomial and logistic regression analyses were performed for baseline EOS/FeNO (separately and combined), by diagnosis, and for different exacerbation subtypes (all, antibiotics-only, oral corticosteroids (OCS)-only). Results: Higher baseline EOS was significantly associated with increased risk of all exacerbations in asthma (incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.18, p=0.033), with a trend increase with COPD (IRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19, p=0.069) but not asthma+COPD. Higher baseline FeNO was significantly associated with decreased risk of all exacerbations in COPD (IRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99, p=0.025) and increased risk of OCS-only exacerbations in asthma (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.29, p=0.006) and asthma+COPD (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.97, p<0.001). In exacerbation risk in asthma (IRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.24, p=0.003), while in COPD, both higher EOS (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.24, p=0.033) and lower FeNO (IRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.96, p=0.009) were independently associated with exacerbation risk. Conclusions: Higher EOS predicted exacerbations in asthma and COPD, while FeNO showed heterogeneous associations, particularly for OCS-only treated exacerbations. Assessment of exacerbation subtype might improve personalised management. Interpretation is limited by physician-assigned diagnoses, potential ICS confounding and recall bias.
Association of blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide with exacerbations in patients with asthma, COPD and asthma+COPD the NOVELTY study_Thorax 2026.pdf
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2153092
Citazioni
ND
0
0
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione.
La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e presenta gli indicatori calcolati alla data indicata sul report. Si ricorda che in sede di domanda ASN presso il MIUR gli indicatori saranno invece calcolati a partire dal 1° gennaio rispettivamente del quinto/decimo/quindicesimo anno precedente la scadenza del quadrimestre di presentazione della domanda (art 2 del DM 598/2018).
In questa simulazione pertanto il valore degli indicatori potrà differire da quello conteggiato all’atto della domanda ASN effettuata presso il MIUR a seguito di:
Correzioni imputabili a eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori.
Presenza di eventuali errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS
Variabilità nel tempo dei valori citazionali (per i settori bibliometrici)
Variabilità della finestra temporale considerata in funzione della sessione di domanda ASN a cui si partecipa.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle regole riportate nel DM 598/2018 e dell'allegata Tabella A e delle specifiche definite all'interno del Focus Group Cineca relativo al modulo IRIS ER. Il Cineca non si assume alcuna responsabilità in merito all'uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione.