Objectives: This study aimed to develop consensual definitions and semiquantitative scoring for structural damage on ultrasound and to test the reliability of individual components of a global Outcome Measures in Rheumatology ultrasound joint damage score (GLODS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: A Delphi survey including statements on normal ultrasound appearance of joint features, scanning technique, new definitions, and scoring systems for 3 components of structural damage (bone erosions, cartilage change, and joint malalignment) was circulated among task force members. After agreement (≥75% of grades 4-5 on a 1-5 Likert scale) was achieved on the statements, datasets of ultrasound images representing various grades of the above-mentioned structural damage components were created and used in 2 web-based exercises. Finally, the metacarpophalangeal joints 1 to 5 of 7 patients with RA were scanned with ultrasound, twice on the same day by 7 task force members for detecting and scoring the 3 components using the consensus-based semiquantitative GLODS. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the new scoring system was measured by weighted kappa. Results: Agreement on a total of 9 statements was reached in 4 Delphi rounds. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the individual components ranged from good to excellent in both the web-based (0.72-0.97) and the live exercises (0.68-0.89). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the total GLODS was shown to be excellent (0.92) and good (0.69), respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasound is a reliable tool for evaluating bone erosions, cartilage change, and joint malalignment in the hand joints of patients with RA. These features can be reliably integrated into a global ultrasound score.

A global OMERACT ultrasound joint damage scoring system (GLODS) in rheumatoid arthritis

Iagnocco, Annamaria;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to develop consensual definitions and semiquantitative scoring for structural damage on ultrasound and to test the reliability of individual components of a global Outcome Measures in Rheumatology ultrasound joint damage score (GLODS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: A Delphi survey including statements on normal ultrasound appearance of joint features, scanning technique, new definitions, and scoring systems for 3 components of structural damage (bone erosions, cartilage change, and joint malalignment) was circulated among task force members. After agreement (≥75% of grades 4-5 on a 1-5 Likert scale) was achieved on the statements, datasets of ultrasound images representing various grades of the above-mentioned structural damage components were created and used in 2 web-based exercises. Finally, the metacarpophalangeal joints 1 to 5 of 7 patients with RA were scanned with ultrasound, twice on the same day by 7 task force members for detecting and scoring the 3 components using the consensus-based semiquantitative GLODS. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the new scoring system was measured by weighted kappa. Results: Agreement on a total of 9 statements was reached in 4 Delphi rounds. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the individual components ranged from good to excellent in both the web-based (0.72-0.97) and the live exercises (0.68-0.89). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the total GLODS was shown to be excellent (0.92) and good (0.69), respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasound is a reliable tool for evaluating bone erosions, cartilage change, and joint malalignment in the hand joints of patients with RA. These features can be reliably integrated into a global ultrasound score.
2026
1
10
Mandl, Peter; Gessl, Irina; Kun, Lyubomyra; Filippou, Georgios; Kortekaas, Marion; Pineda, Carlos; Terslev, Lene; Möller, Ingrid; Backhaus, Marina; Bo...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2157194
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact