Hazard assessment of naturally occurring asbestos and asbestos-like minerals (NOA) is hindered by the lack of standardized criteria for quantifying asbestos-like morphology. This work introduces the fibrosity parameter (Fp), an experimental approach for classifying suspected fibrous minerals. Fp combines standardized mechanical stress with automated morphometric analysis to evaluate changes in the percentage of elongate mineral particles (EMP) during milling. The approach was tested on five antigorite and three tremolite samples spanning fibrous, lamellar, and prismatic morphologies, using crocidolite, amosite, MMVF, and talc as references. Fp is defined by EMP% after 20 min of milling (EMP20%) and the slope of EMP% between 2 and 20 min (S). Thresholds of EMP20% = 50% and S = −1 distinguished four morphological scenarios: 1) asbestos or asbestos-like, 2) precautionary asbestos-like, 3) non-asbestos-like, and 4) non-asbestos. Fibrous antigorite samples and one tremolite retained high EMP contents and behaved comparably to asbestos references, whereas another macroscopically fibrous tremolite progressively lost fibrosity and was classified as non asbestos-like. Thus, macroscopic fibrosity is not a reliable proxy for asbestos-like fragmentation behaviour. Fp provides a quantitative and reproducible morphological screening tool that complements broader hazard assessment. However, Fp is not a stand-alone predictor of pathogenicity.
Quantitative classification of asbestos-like morphology for assessing potentially hazardous fibrous minerals
Petriglieri, Jasmine R.First
Membro del Collaboration Group
;Barale, LucaMembro del Collaboration Group
;Tomatis, MauraMembro del Collaboration Group
;De Giuli, ChiaraMembro del Collaboration Group
;Belluso, ElenaMembro del Collaboration Group
;Piana, Fabrizio;Turci, Francesco
Last
Membro del Collaboration Group
2026-01-01
Abstract
Hazard assessment of naturally occurring asbestos and asbestos-like minerals (NOA) is hindered by the lack of standardized criteria for quantifying asbestos-like morphology. This work introduces the fibrosity parameter (Fp), an experimental approach for classifying suspected fibrous minerals. Fp combines standardized mechanical stress with automated morphometric analysis to evaluate changes in the percentage of elongate mineral particles (EMP) during milling. The approach was tested on five antigorite and three tremolite samples spanning fibrous, lamellar, and prismatic morphologies, using crocidolite, amosite, MMVF, and talc as references. Fp is defined by EMP% after 20 min of milling (EMP20%) and the slope of EMP% between 2 and 20 min (S). Thresholds of EMP20% = 50% and S = −1 distinguished four morphological scenarios: 1) asbestos or asbestos-like, 2) precautionary asbestos-like, 3) non-asbestos-like, and 4) non-asbestos. Fibrous antigorite samples and one tremolite retained high EMP contents and behaved comparably to asbestos references, whereas another macroscopically fibrous tremolite progressively lost fibrosity and was classified as non asbestos-like. Thus, macroscopic fibrosity is not a reliable proxy for asbestos-like fragmentation behaviour. Fp provides a quantitative and reproducible morphological screening tool that complements broader hazard assessment. However, Fp is not a stand-alone predictor of pathogenicity.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Petriglieri et al. (2026) - Fibrosity PDF EDITORIALE.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: PDF Editoriale
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
13.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
13.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



