Hazard assessment of naturally occurring asbestos and asbestos-like minerals (NOA) is hindered by the lack of standardized criteria for quantifying asbestos-like morphology. This work introduces the fibrosity parameter (Fp), an experimental approach for classifying suspected fibrous minerals. Fp combines standardized mechanical stress with automated morphometric analysis to evaluate changes in the percentage of elongate mineral particles (EMP) during milling. The approach was tested on five antigorite and three tremolite samples spanning fibrous, lamellar, and prismatic morphologies, using crocidolite, amosite, MMVF, and talc as references. Fp is defined by EMP% after 20 min of milling (EMP20%) and the slope of EMP% between 2 and 20 min (S). Thresholds of EMP20% = 50% and S = −1 distinguished four morphological scenarios: 1) asbestos or asbestos-like, 2) precautionary asbestos-like, 3) non-asbestos-like, and 4) non-asbestos. Fibrous antigorite samples and one tremolite retained high EMP contents and behaved comparably to asbestos references, whereas another macroscopically fibrous tremolite progressively lost fibrosity and was classified as non asbestos-like. Thus, macroscopic fibrosity is not a reliable proxy for asbestos-like fragmentation behaviour. Fp provides a quantitative and reproducible morphological screening tool that complements broader hazard assessment. However, Fp is not a stand-alone predictor of pathogenicity.

Quantitative classification of asbestos-like morphology for assessing potentially hazardous fibrous minerals

Petriglieri, Jasmine R.
First
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Barale, Luca
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Tomatis, Maura
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
De Giuli, Chiara
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Belluso, Elena
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Piana, Fabrizio;Turci, Francesco
Last
Membro del Collaboration Group
2026-01-01

Abstract

Hazard assessment of naturally occurring asbestos and asbestos-like minerals (NOA) is hindered by the lack of standardized criteria for quantifying asbestos-like morphology. This work introduces the fibrosity parameter (Fp), an experimental approach for classifying suspected fibrous minerals. Fp combines standardized mechanical stress with automated morphometric analysis to evaluate changes in the percentage of elongate mineral particles (EMP) during milling. The approach was tested on five antigorite and three tremolite samples spanning fibrous, lamellar, and prismatic morphologies, using crocidolite, amosite, MMVF, and talc as references. Fp is defined by EMP% after 20 min of milling (EMP20%) and the slope of EMP% between 2 and 20 min (S). Thresholds of EMP20% = 50% and S = −1 distinguished four morphological scenarios: 1) asbestos or asbestos-like, 2) precautionary asbestos-like, 3) non-asbestos-like, and 4) non-asbestos. Fibrous antigorite samples and one tremolite retained high EMP contents and behaved comparably to asbestos references, whereas another macroscopically fibrous tremolite progressively lost fibrosity and was classified as non asbestos-like. Thus, macroscopic fibrosity is not a reliable proxy for asbestos-like fragmentation behaviour. Fp provides a quantitative and reproducible morphological screening tool that complements broader hazard assessment. However, Fp is not a stand-alone predictor of pathogenicity.
2026
516
143415
143426
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304389426023952
Antigorite; Elongate mineral particles; Fibrosity; Hazard assessment; Morphometry; Naturally occurring asbestos; Tremolite
Petriglieri, Jasmine R.; Barale, Luca; Tomatis, Maura; Cavallo, Alessandro; De Giuli, Chiara; Bruno, Maria Rosaria; Olori, Angelo; Bruni, Biagio Maria...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Petriglieri et al. (2026) - Fibrosity PDF EDITORIALE.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: PDF Editoriale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 13.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
13.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2159237
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact