In the relationship between property rights, specifically defined as ius aedificandi, and urban planning, there has always been a tension between the individual interest in the economically advantageous use of property and the public interest in an orderly and planned urban development of the territory. It has long been clear that the power of the public administration, which defines the content of property rights in relation to a generality of assets (Article 42, paragraph 2, of the Constitution), does not assume an expropriative legal nature. That is, limits and obligations are placed on private property while preserving its economic use.
Intelligenza artificiale e governo del territorio: i limiti intelligenti alla proprietà edilizia
Emma Scapino
2026-01-01
Abstract
In the relationship between property rights, specifically defined as ius aedificandi, and urban planning, there has always been a tension between the individual interest in the economically advantageous use of property and the public interest in an orderly and planned urban development of the territory. It has long been clear that the power of the public administration, which defines the content of property rights in relation to a generality of assets (Article 42, paragraph 2, of the Constitution), does not assume an expropriative legal nature. That is, limits and obligations are placed on private property while preserving its economic use.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Intelligenza artificiale e governo del territorio: i limiti intelligenti alla proprietà edilizia.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
1.13 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.13 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



