Electrochemical CO2 capture via pH-swing electrolyzers offers a promising alternative to thermally driven amine scrubbing, yet mass transfer limitations at the gas-liquid interface remain a critical bottleneck limiting scalability. This work addresses this challenge through a novel reactor architecture integrating gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) to enable in-situ CO2 capture at the electrode surface. We systematically evaluated two flow regimes: the flow-by (diffusion dominated) and flow-through (convective gas transport) and compared their performance against conventional ex-situ setups including bulk bubbling and countercurrent scrubbing. Using 0.1 M 2,7-anthraquinone disulfonic acid (AQDS) as a model active redox carrier, the in-situ setup achieved 213.0 mL captured CO2 versus 152.2 mL for bulk one, representing a 39.9% volumetric gain. Energy consumption decreased from 86.1 kJ·mol−1 (bulk) to 66.7 kJ·mol−1 (in-situ), corresponding to 22.5% reduction. Finally, it demonstrated superior capture efficiency (43.7%), volumetric capacity (5.6 kgm−3) with minimum CO2 concentrations of 6.4% from a 10% feed stream compared to the ex-situ setups. Continuous operation over 96 h confirmed reversible cycling without performance degradation. These findings establish reactor engineering as the primary design variable for electrochemical capture systems, enabling substantial performance improvements independent of electrolyte optimization. The demonstrated scalability pathway provides actionable design principles for industrial CO2 capture applications across diverse source concentrations.

In-situ CO2 capture outperforms conventional bulk pH-swing electrolyzers

Francesca Cardano;Andrea Fin;Daniele Sassone
2026-01-01

Abstract

Electrochemical CO2 capture via pH-swing electrolyzers offers a promising alternative to thermally driven amine scrubbing, yet mass transfer limitations at the gas-liquid interface remain a critical bottleneck limiting scalability. This work addresses this challenge through a novel reactor architecture integrating gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) to enable in-situ CO2 capture at the electrode surface. We systematically evaluated two flow regimes: the flow-by (diffusion dominated) and flow-through (convective gas transport) and compared their performance against conventional ex-situ setups including bulk bubbling and countercurrent scrubbing. Using 0.1 M 2,7-anthraquinone disulfonic acid (AQDS) as a model active redox carrier, the in-situ setup achieved 213.0 mL captured CO2 versus 152.2 mL for bulk one, representing a 39.9% volumetric gain. Energy consumption decreased from 86.1 kJ·mol−1 (bulk) to 66.7 kJ·mol−1 (in-situ), corresponding to 22.5% reduction. Finally, it demonstrated superior capture efficiency (43.7%), volumetric capacity (5.6 kgm−3) with minimum CO2 concentrations of 6.4% from a 10% feed stream compared to the ex-situ setups. Continuous operation over 96 h confirmed reversible cycling without performance degradation. These findings establish reactor engineering as the primary design variable for electrochemical capture systems, enabling substantial performance improvements independent of electrolyte optimization. The demonstrated scalability pathway provides actionable design principles for industrial CO2 capture applications across diverse source concentrations.
2026
182338
182345
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894726098013?via=ihub
CO2 capture, pH swing, redox carriers, electrochemistry
Silvia Di Martino, Alessio Mezza, Rebecca Toscano, Adriano Sacco,Francesca Cardano, Andrea Fin, Daniele Sassone
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1385894726098013-main.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 4.55 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.55 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2164010
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact