Noninvasive stress and pharmacologic tests with procainamide and propafenone were studied as methods to identify patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) who would otherwise be judged at risk of sudden death on the basis of electrophysiologic criteria: the shortest RR interval during induced atrial fibrillation less than or equal to 250 ms or accessory pathway anterograde effective refractory period less than or equal to 250 ms. Sixty-five patients were studied. Twenty-four patients fulfilled the electrophysiologic risk criteria (group A) and 41 patients fulfilled none of these criteria (group B). Persistence of preexcitation during stress test showed a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 17% to identify group A patients; its positive predictive value was 40% and negative predictive value 88%. With both procainamide and propafenone tests persistence of preexcitation identified group A patients with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 51%; their positive and negative predictive value were, respectively, 53 and 95%. Stress and pharmacologic tests have good sensitivity and negative predictive value, but low specificity and positive predictive value.

Stress and pharmacologic tests as methods to identify patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome at risk of sudden death.

GAITA, Fiorenzo;GIUSTETTO, Carla;BRUSCA, Antonio
1989-01-01

Abstract

Noninvasive stress and pharmacologic tests with procainamide and propafenone were studied as methods to identify patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) who would otherwise be judged at risk of sudden death on the basis of electrophysiologic criteria: the shortest RR interval during induced atrial fibrillation less than or equal to 250 ms or accessory pathway anterograde effective refractory period less than or equal to 250 ms. Sixty-five patients were studied. Twenty-four patients fulfilled the electrophysiologic risk criteria (group A) and 41 patients fulfilled none of these criteria (group B). Persistence of preexcitation during stress test showed a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 17% to identify group A patients; its positive predictive value was 40% and negative predictive value 88%. With both procainamide and propafenone tests persistence of preexcitation identified group A patients with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 51%; their positive and negative predictive value were, respectively, 53 and 95%. Stress and pharmacologic tests have good sensitivity and negative predictive value, but low specificity and positive predictive value.
1989
64
487
490
GAITA F ;GIUSTETTO C ;RICCARDI R ;MANGIARDI L ;BRUSCA A
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/34613
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 72
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact