Poorly differentiated (PD) thyroid carcinomas lie both morphologically and behaviorally between well-differentiated and undifferentiated (anaplastic) carcinomas. Following the original description of this entity, different diagnostic criteria have been employed, resulting in wide discrepancies and confusion among pathologists and clinicians worldwide. To compare lesions occurring in different geographic areas and the diagnostic criteria applied in those countries, we designed a study with a panel of internationally recognized thyroid pathologists to develop consensus diagnostic criteria for PD carcinomas. Eighty-three cases were collected from Europe, Japan, and the United States, and circulated among 12 thyroid pathologists. Diagnoses were made without any knowledge of the clinical parameters, which were subsequently used for survival analysis. A consensus meeting was then held in Turin, Italy, where an agreement was reached concerning the diagnostic criteria for PD carcinoma. These include (1) presence of a solid/trabecular/insular pattern of growth, (2) absence of the conventional nuclear features of papillary carcinoma, and (3) presence of at least one of the following features: convoluted nuclei; mitotic activity >or=3 x 10 HPF; and tumor necrosis. An algorithmic approach was devised for practical use in the diagnosis of this tumor.

Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: the Turin proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria and an algorithmic diagnostic approach

VOLANTE, Marco;PAPOTTI, Mauro Giulio;BUSSOLATI, Giovanni;
2007-01-01

Abstract

Poorly differentiated (PD) thyroid carcinomas lie both morphologically and behaviorally between well-differentiated and undifferentiated (anaplastic) carcinomas. Following the original description of this entity, different diagnostic criteria have been employed, resulting in wide discrepancies and confusion among pathologists and clinicians worldwide. To compare lesions occurring in different geographic areas and the diagnostic criteria applied in those countries, we designed a study with a panel of internationally recognized thyroid pathologists to develop consensus diagnostic criteria for PD carcinomas. Eighty-three cases were collected from Europe, Japan, and the United States, and circulated among 12 thyroid pathologists. Diagnoses were made without any knowledge of the clinical parameters, which were subsequently used for survival analysis. A consensus meeting was then held in Turin, Italy, where an agreement was reached concerning the diagnostic criteria for PD carcinoma. These include (1) presence of a solid/trabecular/insular pattern of growth, (2) absence of the conventional nuclear features of papillary carcinoma, and (3) presence of at least one of the following features: convoluted nuclei; mitotic activity >or=3 x 10 HPF; and tumor necrosis. An algorithmic approach was devised for practical use in the diagnosis of this tumor.
2007
31
1256
1264
Adenocarcinoma; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; 80 and over; Algorithms; Cell Nucleus; Child; Preschool; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Middle Aged; Mitosis; Necrosis; Survival Rate; Thyroid Neoplasms; Tumor Markers; Biological
VOLANTE M; COLLINI P; NIKIFOROV YE; SAKAMOTO A; KAKUDO K; KATOH R; LLOYD RV; LIVOLSI VA; PAPOTTI M; SOBRINHO-SIMOES M; BUSSOLATI G; ROSAI J
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Volante M et al AJSP PD thyroid carcinoma.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 663.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
663.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/35220
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 123
  • Scopus 462
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 397
social impact