BACKGROUND: Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) are present in small numbers in the cord blood of healthy fetuses at birth. Acute and chronic stimuli, such as fetal hypoxia, cause increased circulating levels of NRBCs. Manual counting is presently the only way to quantify NRBCs, but it is time-consuming and inaccurate. Recently, automated approaches have been developed in order to quantify NRBCs. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare manual vs. automated NRBC counting and derive reference values in umbilical cord blood samples from healthy term fetuses. METHODS: We analyzed blood samples from 131 healthy term fetuses by the automated approach and calculated reference values of NRBC counts as percentiles. To compare automated NRBC count with manual count we obtained umbilical cord blood samples from 50 further fetuses. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation was obtained between the two methods (r(2) = 0.988, Bland-Altman plot mean difference NRBCs/100 WBC: -0.590). The median for NRBCs/100 WBC was 3.05 (range 0-11.6) and the median for absolute NRBC counts x10(9)/l was 0.39 (range 0-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that values obtained with the automated NRBC counting method are comparable to those obtained with the microscopic manual evaluation and give reference values for umbilical cord NRBCs at term that can be used in clinical practice.

Nucleated red blood cells in term fetuses: reference values using an automated analyzer.

ROLFO, Alessandro;CARDAROPOLI, Simona;BIOLCATI, Marilisa;TODROS, Tullia
2007-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) are present in small numbers in the cord blood of healthy fetuses at birth. Acute and chronic stimuli, such as fetal hypoxia, cause increased circulating levels of NRBCs. Manual counting is presently the only way to quantify NRBCs, but it is time-consuming and inaccurate. Recently, automated approaches have been developed in order to quantify NRBCs. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare manual vs. automated NRBC counting and derive reference values in umbilical cord blood samples from healthy term fetuses. METHODS: We analyzed blood samples from 131 healthy term fetuses by the automated approach and calculated reference values of NRBC counts as percentiles. To compare automated NRBC count with manual count we obtained umbilical cord blood samples from 50 further fetuses. RESULTS: Significant positive correlation was obtained between the two methods (r(2) = 0.988, Bland-Altman plot mean difference NRBCs/100 WBC: -0.590). The median for NRBCs/100 WBC was 3.05 (range 0-11.6) and the median for absolute NRBC counts x10(9)/l was 0.39 (range 0-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that values obtained with the automated NRBC counting method are comparable to those obtained with the microscopic manual evaluation and give reference values for umbilical cord NRBCs at term that can be used in clinical practice.
2007
92(3)
205
208
Nucleated red blood cells; Hypoxia; Fetuses
ROLFO A; MACONI M; CARDAROPOLI S; BIOLCATI M; DANISE P; TODROS T
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
NEONATOLOGY_2007.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 151.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
151.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/39655
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact