PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the automatic full field perfusion image analysis (AFFPIA) program on Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter (HRF) derived perfusion images in a multicentre study group. METHODS: A total of 10 subjects were consecutively recruited in the study. One eye was randomly selected for each patient. Blood flow was assessed by HRF and flow measurements were analyzed by using the AFFPIA program. AFFPIA calculates the Doppler frequency shift and the haemodynamic variables: flow for each pixel. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was calculated for AFFPIA program. The retinal blood flow was calculated in the superior and inferior section, furthermore, each section was divided into three parts: the temporal area, the nasal, and the rim area, as for software, but only the temporal and nasal areas were considered in this study. The blood flow and the area considered were evaluated for each part. RESULTS: When the intraobserver and intraimage reproducibility was studied, the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.4 to 1.9%. When the interobserver and intraimage reproducibility was studied, the retinal blood flow coefficient of variation ranged from 0.52 to 3.30% for the supero-temporal area, from 0.13 to 2.67% for the inferotemporal area, from 0.15 to 2.75% for the supero-nasal area, and from 0.04 to 5.65% for the infero-nasal area. CONCLUSION: Our results with AFFPIA showed an interobserver coefficient of variation of retinal blood flow measurements always less than 6% in both temporal and nasal areas. No significant difference was found among the four observers for the flow measurements.

Observer interpretation variability of peripapillary flow using the Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter

ROLLE, Teresa;
2006-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the automatic full field perfusion image analysis (AFFPIA) program on Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter (HRF) derived perfusion images in a multicentre study group. METHODS: A total of 10 subjects were consecutively recruited in the study. One eye was randomly selected for each patient. Blood flow was assessed by HRF and flow measurements were analyzed by using the AFFPIA program. AFFPIA calculates the Doppler frequency shift and the haemodynamic variables: flow for each pixel. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was calculated for AFFPIA program. The retinal blood flow was calculated in the superior and inferior section, furthermore, each section was divided into three parts: the temporal area, the nasal, and the rim area, as for software, but only the temporal and nasal areas were considered in this study. The blood flow and the area considered were evaluated for each part. RESULTS: When the intraobserver and intraimage reproducibility was studied, the coefficient of variation ranged from 0.4 to 1.9%. When the interobserver and intraimage reproducibility was studied, the retinal blood flow coefficient of variation ranged from 0.52 to 3.30% for the supero-temporal area, from 0.13 to 2.67% for the inferotemporal area, from 0.15 to 2.75% for the supero-nasal area, and from 0.04 to 5.65% for the infero-nasal area. CONCLUSION: Our results with AFFPIA showed an interobserver coefficient of variation of retinal blood flow measurements always less than 6% in both temporal and nasal areas. No significant difference was found among the four observers for the flow measurements.
2006
EYE
20 (11)
1246
1253
IESTER M; CIANCAGLINI M; ROLLE T; VATTOVANI O
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Observer interpretation variability.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 148.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
148.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/40019
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact