OBJECTIVE: The shortage of cobalt (Co) on the metal market forced the industry to add nickel (Ni) to Co as a binding agent for the sintering of hard metal. This change enabled us to study (1) the exposure to Ni powder and (2) the effect of Ni on Co uptake (and vice versa). METHODS: Equal amounts of Co and Ni were used in the mixture in a plant employing 50 workers. Both personal ambient-air samples and single-void urine samples were taken twice in the same week, i.e., on Monday and Thursday. Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) was used for analyses. RESULTS: The airborne availability of Ni (mean value 41.65 +/- 6.29 micrograms/m3) was 2-fold that of Co (mean value 21.85 +/- 24.25 micrograms/m3), although the two series of data (n = 20) were significantly correlated. Even if the Co and Ni urinary concentration values (n = 45) recorded on Monday morning and Thursday evening were significantly correlated, at the end of the week there was a 3-fold increase, specifically, from 7.3 to 22.28 micrograms/l, in Co elimination (a significant difference) and a 30% increase in Ni elimination from 11.98 to 15.83 micrograms/l. Moreover, on Monday morning, 90% of Ni urinary concentration values were higher than those of Co as opposed to only 33% on Thursday evening. In the six cases in which both airborne and urine determinations were performed on the 2 days, no significant relationship was found between external exposure and biological monitoring data. CONCLUSIONS: Although Ni uptake was variable, it was generally low, whereas Co uptake was substantial, as had previously been observed in the same plant when Co was the only binder under use. It was therefore possible to rule out any influence of Ni exposure on Co uptake and to suggest the contrary, as has been demonstrated in bacterial species and in rats using everted intestinal sacs.

Exposure to cobalt and nickel in the hard-metal production industry.

SCANSETTI, Giovanni;MAINA, Giovanni;
1998-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The shortage of cobalt (Co) on the metal market forced the industry to add nickel (Ni) to Co as a binding agent for the sintering of hard metal. This change enabled us to study (1) the exposure to Ni powder and (2) the effect of Ni on Co uptake (and vice versa). METHODS: Equal amounts of Co and Ni were used in the mixture in a plant employing 50 workers. Both personal ambient-air samples and single-void urine samples were taken twice in the same week, i.e., on Monday and Thursday. Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) was used for analyses. RESULTS: The airborne availability of Ni (mean value 41.65 +/- 6.29 micrograms/m3) was 2-fold that of Co (mean value 21.85 +/- 24.25 micrograms/m3), although the two series of data (n = 20) were significantly correlated. Even if the Co and Ni urinary concentration values (n = 45) recorded on Monday morning and Thursday evening were significantly correlated, at the end of the week there was a 3-fold increase, specifically, from 7.3 to 22.28 micrograms/l, in Co elimination (a significant difference) and a 30% increase in Ni elimination from 11.98 to 15.83 micrograms/l. Moreover, on Monday morning, 90% of Ni urinary concentration values were higher than those of Co as opposed to only 33% on Thursday evening. In the six cases in which both airborne and urine determinations were performed on the 2 days, no significant relationship was found between external exposure and biological monitoring data. CONCLUSIONS: Although Ni uptake was variable, it was generally low, whereas Co uptake was substantial, as had previously been observed in the same plant when Co was the only binder under use. It was therefore possible to rule out any influence of Ni exposure on Co uptake and to suggest the contrary, as has been demonstrated in bacterial species and in rats using everted intestinal sacs.
1998
71
60
63
Nickel; Cobalt; Hard metal; Exposure; Biological monitoring
Scansetti G; Maina G; Botta GC; Bambace P; Spinelli P
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1998_Exposure_Int Arch Occup Inv Health.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 266.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
266.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/40176
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 52
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact