Surgery remains the main curative treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, because many patients probably have undetectable micrometastasis even at diagnosis, adjuvant treatment is usually needed. The results for radiotherapy have mostly been disappointing, and a strong emphasis has, therefore, been placed on chemotherapy as the preferred modality. Adjuvant chemotherapy, and in particular, platinum-based regimens, have been assessed in several studies, but the results have been conflicting. Most trials have included patients with a wide range of disease stages and have shown, at most, only moderate improvements in survival. Thus, although clearly indicated in some patients, whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be used in all patients with resected disease is highly controversial. In this debate, Thierry Le Chevalier and colleagues and Giorgio Scagliotti present opposing arguments for whether this approach should be considered standard.

Should adjuvant chemotherapy become standard treatment in all patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer?

SCAGLIOTTI, Giorgio Vittorio
2005-01-01

Abstract

Surgery remains the main curative treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, because many patients probably have undetectable micrometastasis even at diagnosis, adjuvant treatment is usually needed. The results for radiotherapy have mostly been disappointing, and a strong emphasis has, therefore, been placed on chemotherapy as the preferred modality. Adjuvant chemotherapy, and in particular, platinum-based regimens, have been assessed in several studies, but the results have been conflicting. Most trials have included patients with a wide range of disease stages and have shown, at most, only moderate improvements in survival. Thus, although clearly indicated in some patients, whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be used in all patients with resected disease is highly controversial. In this debate, Thierry Le Chevalier and colleagues and Giorgio Scagliotti present opposing arguments for whether this approach should be considered standard.
2005
6(3)
182
184
LE CHEVALIER T; ARRIAGADA R; PIGNON JP; SCAGLIOTTI GV
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
doi_10.1016_S1470-2045(05)01769-9.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 174.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
174.27 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/43063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact