As part of an interdisciplinary research program on Alpine populations, we studied the biodemographic evolution of two populations of the Dauphiné in the period 1690-1799. We analyzed several indices derived from surname analysis to infer the genetic structure of the populations. Although situated in the same area of the Dauphiné, the two communities of Vallouise and Chiomonte had very different biodemographic characteristics. Vallouise was very populated but genetically homogeneous, whereas Chiomonte was less populated but more heterogeneous. The two districts also differed in geographical position: Vallouise was a glacier-enclosed valley that did not attract new inhabitants; Chiomonte was situated in an open valley served by important roads and thus able to attract many new inhabitants. The demographic differences between the two populations explain the differences in genetic structure. The index of isonymic relationship (Ri) different from zero is due to the rare marriages between members of the two populations. Since Ri is based on surnames, which are mostly polyphyletic, it can overestimate the genetic relationships between the populations, as in the case of consanguinity assessed by matrimonial isonymy.

Surname analysis in biological anthropology. The case of Alpine populations during the 17th and 18th centuries

GIROTTI, Marilena;RABINO, Emma
2008-01-01

Abstract

As part of an interdisciplinary research program on Alpine populations, we studied the biodemographic evolution of two populations of the Dauphiné in the period 1690-1799. We analyzed several indices derived from surname analysis to infer the genetic structure of the populations. Although situated in the same area of the Dauphiné, the two communities of Vallouise and Chiomonte had very different biodemographic characteristics. Vallouise was very populated but genetically homogeneous, whereas Chiomonte was less populated but more heterogeneous. The two districts also differed in geographical position: Vallouise was a glacier-enclosed valley that did not attract new inhabitants; Chiomonte was situated in an open valley served by important roads and thus able to attract many new inhabitants. The demographic differences between the two populations explain the differences in genetic structure. The index of isonymic relationship (Ri) different from zero is due to the rare marriages between members of the two populations. Since Ri is based on surnames, which are mostly polyphyletic, it can overestimate the genetic relationships between the populations, as in the case of consanguinity assessed by matrimonial isonymy.
2008
80-4
377
391
Kinship; Biodemography; Briançon; Isonymy; Matrimonial exchanges
Prost M.; Boëtsch G. ; Girotti M. ; Rabino Massa E.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/44063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact